I saw it in this article of the mercI'm not sure that's true anymore? That was speculated when lottery-protection was the condition. Now the condition for that pick is just a 1st or a 2nd depending on re-signing.
It makes no sense to re-sign him if you're San Jose, even if he does well.
You can just go after a different free agent, who will cost a similar amount against the cap and will not cost a first rounder.
****ty return for Buffalo in the end. Very disappointed.
what?The Sharks are not gonna be a lottery team like ever, so it's pointless.
I'm not saying the trade wasn't worth it. Great value for San Jose, but you'll soon realize that Kane has way too many warts to his game. That's why no contenders wanted to ante up a late first round pick for Kane. Jets fans warned Sabres fans, and now Sabres fans are warning Sharks fans.DW will only re-sign if its a reasonable contract, ie wont overpay. So either he performs well and is signed to a nice contract the following year and is worth the 1st or we gave up a 2nd round pick, practically only, which is also worth it
You Forgot......Sort of closes a chapter on the big Jets Sabres trade. Looks weak for the Sabres...
Roslovic >> conditional 2019 2nd/1st
Armia > O'Regan
Lemieux >> 4th
He means the Sharks will always try and will themselves from being a bottom feeder or miss the playoffs. But IMO they are pretty damn close to being that with a thin prospect pool and an aged core.what?
I think that this will be meaningfull time for Kane. Let’s see what he does with a strong locker room.kane needs a change of scenery and hes gonna get it.
he is super talented but has been on 'bad' teams. leading to some bad habits. this is just what the doctor ordered for the sharks and also for kane.
ive been guilty of calling kane a locker room cancer in the past..... but maybe he just didnt have a decent locker room to begin with. pulling a 180 on kane. good move.
It's technically both, we see them listed both ways quite regularly. Generally when it involves first round picks, they saw conditional first because it makes the return sound better for the selling team.That's a conditional 2nd, not a conditional 1st. The guaranteed pick is the pick that gets listed.
As pointed out by Botterill, that was the only offer the Sabres got that contained a first round pick. We've been telling you for months that no one was going to overpay for that piece of fecal matter, but you refused to admit to yourself or anyone else that Kane's reputation killed any value he could have had.This is disgraceful return. Botterill messed up big time.
If I were Wilson, the first thing I would do is take Kane on a tour of AlacatrazI’m excited, dudes gonna kill it. Sharks org keeps players on a short leash
No reason? That's like saying Ted Kaczynski was shit on for no reason.Here's hoping Kane goes on a tear. The guy gets **** on for no reason.
Multiple conditions. The pick becomes a first if:I saw in rwitter its a 1st if shrks advance in the pl0ayoffs...was it making the cup final or winning the cup ??
I guess it's just sad that they chose to take a lesser offer from San Jose than the better offer they received from some unknown team just because Botterill is BFFs with Doug Wilson. The NHL should look into it IMO.Buffalo could have done better than this.
It always amuses when people say this. Why the hell wouldn't they do better if they could ?? Please explain to me.Buffalo could have done better than this.
It always amuses when people say this. Why the hell wouldn't they do better if they could ?? Please explain to me.
You've gotta wonder what kind of value that Botterill could have got for Kane if he traded him on his hot streak. There was a time, not all that long ago, when Evander Kane had more goals and assists than Patrick Kane; he was on pace for like 38 goals and 38 assists after like half of the season. You've got to think at that point it wouldn't have been hard to acquire an unconditional first round pick at the very least and probably a better prospect than O'Regan on top of that.
agreedHe means the Sharks will always try and will themselves from being a bottom feeder or miss the playoffs. IMO they are pretty damn close to being that with a thin prospect pool and an aged core.
How come? Their future looks bleak unless I'm missing something?They're far from it actually.
How come? Their future looks bleak unless I'm missing something?
Disagree. Thornton’s really the only “aged” player and he’s still playing well. They have Couture, Vlasic, Burns, Jones in their primes and Hertl, Tierney, Donskoi, Meier, Ryan, and Labanc as up and coming players that all look like they could be great players.He means the Sharks will always try and will themselves from being a bottom feeder or miss the playoffs. But IMO they are pretty damn close to being that with a thin prospect pool and an aged core.
Meh. Big rental trades rarely happen around Christmas. I doubt there were any serious offers on the table for Kane back in December.
Botterill wants a 1, conditional pick, a prospect and a roster player... is mocked by hfboards.
Gets a 1, conditional pick and prospect... is deemed a big loss by hf boards.
The condition on the 1 is a standard lottery protection.