Speculation: Should the Pens become a trapping team?

Jaded-Fan

Registered User
Mar 18, 2004
52,636
14,512
Pittsburgh
The Pens certainly are bucking the way the NHL is played, and how to win in the current NHL. Of the teams who were involved in games where the most goals were scored in the NHL this year they are the only ones to even make the playoffs, and they struggled there as they have each of the years since winning the cup. The question becomes, is their model flawed and bucking the current state of the NHL? Let's look at that state a little more closely.

'For the fourth straight year, the NHL saw a decline in goal scoring in 2013 with an average of 5.44 goals per game.

The league hasn't quite dropped down to the level that it was in the late 1990s and early 2000s, a period in league history that is infamously referred to as "the dead puck era." But it's something that keeps going down, even if only slightly, and the 2013 season is still one of the lowest scoring campaigns in history.

......

• Of the five teams that played in the highest scoring games this season (goals for plus goals against), four missed the playoffs (Tampa Bay, Carolina, Calgary and Florida). The Penguins, whose games featured an average of 5.92 goals per game, were the only team in the top five to make the playoffs. Tampa Bay, Carolina and Calgary all played games with an average of six goals or more.


Goals.jpg


(Goals per game for both teams)

http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/blog/eye-on-hockey/22167901/goal-scoring-declines-in-the-nhl-again

1990 5,805 3.46
1991 6,123 3.48
1992 7,311 3.63
1993 7,081 3.24
1994 3,727 2.99
1995 6,701 3.14
1996 6,216 2.92
1997 5,624 2.64
1998 5,830 2.63
1999 6,306 2.75
2000 6,782 2.76
2001 6,442 2.62
2002 6,530 2.65
2003 6,318 2.57
2005 7,443 3.03
2006 7,082 2.88
2007 6,691 2.72
2008 7,006 2.85
2009 6,803 2.77
2010 6,721 2.73
2011 6,545 2.66
2012 3,822 2.65

(Goals per game per team)

http://www.sportingcharts.com/articles/nhl/average-goals-scored-per-game-in-the-nhl.aspx

Now with that said the NHL has apparently noted the problem and taken a baby step in the direction of addressing the issue with slightly smaller goalie pads next year. But none of that addresses the real issue of the game, that you can load up on a bunch of mediocre talent hacks and clutch, grab and tackle skilled players to your hearts content.

How long should we fight against the current state of the NHL and play a system better suited to another era before giving in and fitting how the current NHL is played?
 

Karnage420*

Guest
i wish we would.

but nope. we'll be the regular season kings for a few years. first round exits will be an annual affair.

thanks bylsma.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,590
1,269
Montreal, QC
Did you miss Game 6 of the Cup finals? One minute to go, Bruins set up the mother of all traps, Patrick Kane walks around all of them, shoots on net, wins back the puck, gets it to Toews, to Bickell...goal.

At the end of the day, a highly skilled team won the Cup again. Since 2008, skill has won the championship four out of the six times.

Instead of the trap, if THIS team used its skill to the most of their ability, if they were complemented by people driving hard to the net (like Bickell on the tying goal), then we would be a step closer to Chicago.

Besides, who is coaching this stylistic metamorphosis? The guy whose ONLY answer to why we lose is "we didn't get to our game"?
 

Jules Winnfield

Fleurymanbad
Mar 19, 2010
8,919
1,963
I think we should be a counter-attacking team (call it the trap if you want) instead of being solely focused on getting the puck north as fast as possible, which leads to defensive breakdowns and scoring opportunities for the opposition.
 

Gooch

Registered User
May 28, 2008
14,472
6
Coeur d'Alene Idaho
Our problem is scoring goals against trapping teams in the playoffs and we're going to correct that problem by becoming a trapping team? I don't see how that in any way improves the chances of scoring against those types of teams and only serves as a source of frustration for an entire fanbase as we have to endure the worlds most boring form of system for any sport. Not to mention it's a gigantic Pejorative Slured waste of the amount of money we have tied up into two generational talents. A simple no is just not enough for how horrible of an idea this is.
 

Darth Vitale

Dark Matter
Aug 21, 2003
28,172
114
Darkness
Nope. Chicago and LA have shown you don't need to do it to win, if you have good depth and speed, and fans are the #1 beneficiary of not playing that POC system. Frankly if Boston still had Savard out there (which would alter their top lines significantly) I'm not sure THEY would be doing it.

If we take the kind of top-end talent we have and start playing a slow, trapping game, I will hang em up. I am not paying every year to watch the NJ Devils. Ray wants me to be entertained. Trapping is in direct violation of entertainment standards.
 

Jaded-Fan

Registered User
Mar 18, 2004
52,636
14,512
Pittsburgh
On a related note, a slightly different question. The charts do not lie, the stats do not lie. The league is actively promoting the decline of goal scoring, and each year the goal scoring drops a little more.

Why?

It seems counter intuitive to what the fans actually would want to see. Granted, no one wants to see a recreation of the all star game night in and night out. But there is a lot of room between a little over five goals a game between two teams and the clown act the all star game is. All the league would have to do would be to make sure that clutching and grabbing is penalized more. If there are more PP's for a time so be it. Players would adjust.

What reason would the NHL be for driving scoring down? If anything would drive people away from the sport and keep it from growing it would be to bore people to tears like the NHL seems to be headed.
 

PensPlz

Registered User
Dec 23, 2009
11,355
5,661
Pittsburgh
Personally no. I think the Pens have too much talent to trap. But in this league, these refs with the allowance of so much obstruction, I think it is necessary to win in the playoffs.
 

Darth Vitale

Dark Matter
Aug 21, 2003
28,172
114
Darkness
On a related note, a slightly different question. The charts do not lie, the stats do not lie. The league is actively promoting the decline of goal scoring, and each year the goal scoring drops a little more.

Why?

It seems counter intuitive to what the fans actually would want to see. Granted, no one wants to see a recreation of the all star game night in and night out. But there is a lot of room between a little over five goals a game between two teams and the clown act the all star game is. All the league would have to do would be to make sure that clutching and grabbing is penalized more. If there are more PP's for a time so be it. Players would adjust.

What reason would the NHL be for driving scoring down? If anything would drive people away from the sport and keep it from growing it would be to bore people to tears like the NHL seems to be headed.

Assuming there's something to your theory, my explanation would be simple: the league is trying to find subtle ways (by letting certain things go more than a few years ago), to promote Original Six franchises / make those matchups happen, along with wanting the Pens, Crapitals, LA and other more recently successful teams to do well with their higher octane offenses.

Boston, Rangers, Red Wings... all play trapping defense at times and have showed it even more in the playoffs, when they really try to slow things down. Only the Hawks don't fit the mold there, being more like Pittsburgh in their style than the other 3. Maybe you could add Montreal to this at times with Therrien in there now but I'm not sure where they're headed defensively.

Point not being conspiracy but if they allow more of the trap crap and obstruction stuff (but still less than prior lockout), they figure they're more likely to get the matchups they want at playoff time? I dunno. But it doesn't hurt them for these Original Six teams to be prominently featured in teh playoffs every year, I can tell you that.
 

Letang fan 58

No More Fleury
May 12, 2004
5,814
1
Canada
100% no. Look at what it did to the Caps when they tried to turn a great offensive team into a defensive team. It took 3 years out of the prime of ovie/backstrom/semin's careers and didn't accomplish a thing.

trapping should only be used by weaker teams to try and level the playing field when they cant keep up with the more skilled ones.

One thing we should do though is get a couple of bigger players who are physical and can adapt to the anything goes rules come playoff time. Also get a guy with at least some skill who's big to take focus off Sid, like the Bruins/Hawks do with Bickell/Lucic. I really like the 2 skill 1 grit guy lines.
 

eXile59

Shirts on.
Jan 2, 2009
18,221
1
PA
Like all good teams it should be part of our playbook when protecting a lead late. It should not be our primary method of winning games.

I like the 2-1 fore check, Chicago used it & Boston did at times as well. I think most our defensive problems come from in zone coverage and our unwillingness to use a controlled break out. Instead using that stupid hail marry pass that cause more turn overs than offense.
 

End of Line

Registered User
Mar 20, 2009
24,786
2,374
As our primary forecheck and system? Hell no, too much offensive firepower.

To protect leads late in the game? Yes.
 

eXile59

Shirts on.
Jan 2, 2009
18,221
1
PA
As our primary forecheck and system? Hell no, too much offensive firepower.

To protect leads late in the game? Yes.

That actually sums up what I said but more concise. I think most good teams do this now. Not even Devils use it all the time anymore.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,544
22,068
Pittsburgh
On a related note, a slightly different question. The charts do not lie, the stats do not lie. The league is actively promoting the decline of goal scoring, and each year the goal scoring drops a little more.

Why?

It seems counter intuitive to what the fans actually would want to see. Granted, no one wants to see a recreation of the all star game night in and night out. But there is a lot of room between a little over five goals a game between two teams and the clown act the all star game is. All the league would have to do would be to make sure that clutching and grabbing is penalized more. If there are more PP's for a time so be it. Players would adjust.

What reason would the NHL be for driving scoring down? If anything would drive people away from the sport and keep it from growing it would be to bore people to tears like the NHL seems to be headed.

They are completely unwilling to let that happen. The refs were convinced Powerplays are their fault, not the players.

As for reason to allow clutching intentionally, well its safer if people move around more slowly.
 

#66

Registered User
Dec 30, 2003
11,585
7
Visit site
No... Trapping and chip and chase just shows how dumbed down the NHL has become. The average athlete is better but the NHL plays some pretty nim rod hockey. Its not even fun to watch.

Neither is the Pens sloppy ass play. Its clear as day they like the free lance stuff though.
 

cassius

Registered User
Jul 23, 2004
13,560
706
Yes - too bad Mario would never let it happen.

He loves teams who are absolute goal machines, which is what this team is right now. Also, it explains why there were no changes during the off-season.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,590
1,269
Montreal, QC
I wouldn't even call ourselves a 'goal machine'. We're operating at probably 1/3 of what this team's TRUE offensive potential is.

This system we play is wide open, yes, but the first line is two thirds of a third line, one third generational talent. The second line has a hole on the left side. And the third line lost most of its scoring potential last summer on draft day.

This is not even close to maximizing the offensive output of a team that has Crosby centering Line 1, and Malkin centering Line 2. Not to mention the inconsistencies on the PP.

So, goal machine? Maybe in the regular season when nobody can truly prepare for us. But clearly we're not a goal machine after what transpired in Round 3.
 

Jaded-Fan

Registered User
Mar 18, 2004
52,636
14,512
Pittsburgh
And to get back to my original point, the NHL as presently constructed penalizes teams that are skilled, and favors teams who play a trapping game. Yeah, Chicago won, I was rooting hard for them for just this reason, I would have projectile vomited if Boston got rewarded for playing like linebackers the entire post season and tackling everyone. In the end I want to see skill win out to have faith in the game. Yeah Chicago won in the end but it was a very close thing. Are we out of step and at least do we need to make adjustments if not an all out trap?

Again, the numbers do not lie. Individual stats can, but when that all encompassing and over such a long period, they speak loudly as to where the game is today.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,590
1,269
Montreal, QC
And to get back to my original point, the NHL as presently constructed penalizes teams that are skilled, and favors teams who play a trapping game. Yeah, Chicago won, I was rooting hard for them for just this reason, I would have projectile vomited if Boston got rewarded for playing like linebackers the entire post season and tackling everyone. In the end I want to see skill win out to have faith in the game. Yeah Chicago won in the end but it was a very close thing. Are we out of step and at least do we need to make adjustments if not an all out trap?

Again, the numbers do not lie. Individual stats can, but when that all encompassing and over such a long period, they speak loudly as to where the game is today.


Chicago won. Yeah it was very close but winning the Stanley Cup is RARELY the cakewalk LA made it seem like last year.

We are nowhere near 1995 right now in this league.
 

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,216
16,654
Moncton, NB
I'd be all for it in the playoffs. However, I don't think I could watch the other 82 games of it.
 

Le Magnifique 66

Let's Go Pens
Jun 9, 2006
23,637
3,282
Montreal
The Devils and their trapping system still had Stevens, Niedermayer and most importantly Brodeur. We don't have that. I know we have more power up front but at the end of the day we don't have the D or goalie to rely on
 

WVP

Registered User
Mar 22, 2004
13,399
0
Claude Noel just gave a long breakdown on XM yesterday about scoring goals in today's NHL. Number 1? Going to the net. We didn't do that at all vs Boston.
 

Le Magnifique 66

Let's Go Pens
Jun 9, 2006
23,637
3,282
Montreal
Claude Noel just gave a long breakdown on XM yesterday about scoring goals in today's NHL. Number 1? Going to the net. We didn't do that at all vs Boston.

Bennett did it once in Boston and he beat the D and beat Rask but unfortunately ended off the post. We do need more players that are whiling to go hard to the net
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad