Malice430
Registered User
the only thing that the kings did right in that series was this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkBBvaLn-QY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkBBvaLn-QY
Without the call, there chances of winning that game are still 50/50...
the only thing that the kings did right in that series was this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkBBvaLn-QY
I think that comment was more about the fact Brett Hull didnt actually kick it in...
I think that comment was more about the fact Brett Hull didnt actually kick it in...
A blatant charge, how charming....
seriously. what game was that guy watching?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_URO6cwLbM&feature=related
Want to know the only thing that kept the Kings from winning the cup in 1993?
Patrick Roy
Your own clip shows him not kicking it in.
Actually, I'd say that Zhitnik played the best hockey of his life in the 1993 playoffs. The Kings often matched him up against the opposition's best players. Blake and Sydor were excellent.Los Angeles's rank in goals allowed for the duration of Gretzky's tenure:
1989: T-16th (of 21)
1990: 18th (of 21)
1991: 4th (!) (of 21)
1992: 15th (of 22)
1993: 21st (of 24) ahead of Hartford and two recent expansion teams
1994: 24th (of 26)
1995: T-23rd (of 26)
1996: 23rd (of 26)
1991 really jumps out, doesn't it? Overall, the Kings allowed the most goals of any franchise over Gretzky's eight-year stretch. This was partially a product of the tempo the team played at (Lemieux's Penguins allowed the second most), but they only scored eleven goals more than they allowed over those eight years, so the benefits were slim. They had some talent on defense (Blake, Sydor and Zhitnik from that '93 team are all still playing, for chrissakes) but they were young and not the polished players they would later become.
i know that, i was agreeing with your comment. i posted this clip to prove that to the guy who said it was kicked in