misterjaggers
Registered User
Should the players give Bob Goodenow the axe if he refuses to negotiate a salary cap with the owners?
Steve L said:He should be fired because hes going to do nothing apart from lose them a lot of money which they can never recover.
He banked on the owners giving in but it looks like he got it wrong. He lost his players money and pissed off a lot of fans, of course he should go.
Thats my opinion even he he accepts a cap, he could have done that in the summer and everyone would have been happier, not to mention richer.
BLONG7 said:Knob ... Saskin Robbins ...
DementedReality said:do you think it makes you look witty when you use names like this ?
dr
Dude, that was some witty stuff!BLONG7 said:Knob ... Saskin Robbins ...
Who in the world would NOT be happy to share in their company's success?Seven_Nation_Army said:he should be fired because he is not willing to LINK salaries to revenues
Nope... I leave all the humorous (sp) posts for you to declare, afterall you are considered one of the more demented posters on these boards. The bottom line in taking shots at Knob and Saskins is that neither are interested in the game, just the money they and their PA can extract from it...then go on TV and poke shots at Gary Bettman(whom I am not a big fan) to try to make him and the owners look bad... so if I don't care for either of these guys, who cares?DementedReality said:do you think it makes you look witty when you use names like this ?
dr
Your welcome, these boards tend to get a little too serious at times(ask dr)getnziggywidit said:Dude, that was some witty stuff!
Thanks for the laughs.
DementedReality said:do you think it makes you look witty when you use names like this ?
dr
me2 said:I can't recall you objecting to any of the names Bettman gets called.
me2 said:I can't recall you objecting to any of the names Bettman gets called.
djhn579 said:Also, being the head of the players union, you would think he would be doing more to reduce the player on player violence on the ice. How can he sit back and do nothing when the players he is supposed to be looking out for are getting hit from behind, high sticked in the head, and otherwise are having their careers put at risk? Isn't part of the unions responsibilities to create a safer work environment?
HF2002 said:Don't blame Goodenow or Bettman for their positions. They're doing the job they were hired for. These two are nothing more than the messenger.
I'd be curious to know if he genuinely believes in everything he says, and same with Bettman.
I'll say this - the guy who will get fired will be the one who's percieved to have lost/caved. It's looking like the PA is "losing", so I would say the likelihood is that it will be Goodenow.
go kim johnsson said:Should Gary Bettman be fired if he refuses to discuss luxury tax?
Why isn't this thread called "Flame Bob Goodenow"?