Freudian
Clearly deranged
- Jul 3, 2003
- 50,471
- 17,343
We know that for the real-time stats in the NHL there are wildly differencing standards for awarding hits/givaways/takeaways/blocks from arena to arena. That makes them more or less useless for anything important.
With shot attempt based stats becoming more and more popular, what is done to account for home/away scoring bias when it comes to shots/blocks/missed shots? If the data isn't good coming in, the data on the other end won't be good.
Just looking at the missed shot statistics the teams that are 1st-10th in missed shots in the league have 53.6% of their missed shots at home. The teams 11th-20th have 51% of their missed shots at home. The bottom ten teams in the league have 50.1% of the missed shots at home.
Is the same pattern evident for blocks and shots? Is one of the key factors for having good corsi/fenwick numbers having a good statistics staff at home?
Missed shot statistics:
With shot attempt based stats becoming more and more popular, what is done to account for home/away scoring bias when it comes to shots/blocks/missed shots? If the data isn't good coming in, the data on the other end won't be good.
Just looking at the missed shot statistics the teams that are 1st-10th in missed shots in the league have 53.6% of their missed shots at home. The teams 11th-20th have 51% of their missed shots at home. The bottom ten teams in the league have 50.1% of the missed shots at home.
Is the same pattern evident for blocks and shots? Is one of the key factors for having good corsi/fenwick numbers having a good statistics staff at home?
Missed shot statistics: