SHOALTS - bankers are the ones calling the tune

Status
Not open for further replies.

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
an article appeared in the business sports journal about a year and a half ago stating New Jersey was having a hard time getting loans because of how much dept they were already in compared to their revenues coming in.

New Jersey is one of the teams that needs a cap
 

vanlady

Registered User
Nov 3, 2004
810
0
likea said:
an article appeared in the business sports journal about a year and a half ago stating New Jersey was having a hard time getting loans because of how much dept they were already in compared to their revenues coming in.

New Jersey is one of the teams that needs a cap

Funny if NJ is in such tough financial trouble, how did they sign a deal for a new arena less than a week ago. Add to that Lou Lamarello is one of the best financial managers in the NHL, NJ is one of the have teams.
 

SuperUnknown

Registered User
Mar 14, 2002
4,890
0
Visit site
vanlady said:
Funny if NJ is in such tough financial trouble, how did they sign a deal for a new arena less than a week ago. Add to that Lou Lamarello is one of the best financial managers in the NHL, NJ is one of the have teams.

Yet NJ is one of the teams that were sold for a capital loss not too long ago...
 

nyr7andcounting

Registered User
Feb 24, 2004
1,919
0
likea said:
an article appeared in the business sports journal about a year and a half ago stating New Jersey was having a hard time getting loans because of how much dept they were already in compared to their revenues coming in.

New Jersey is one of the teams that needs a cap

If they needed a cap and needed cost certainty would they be spending $60 million on payroll and financing a new arena? Doubt it.

And you know the Rangers aren't one of those teams, Dolan just bid $600 million for property on the west side where the Jets are trying to build a stadium.
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
vanlady said:
Funny if NJ is in such tough financial trouble, how did they sign a deal for a new arena less than a week ago. Add to that Lou Lamarello is one of the best financial managers in the NHL, NJ is one of the have teams.


NJ is not one of the have teams, they are bleeding money....bleeding

that is why they need a new arena and why they sold like they did, they are now owned by a rich owner who is taking a loss

NHL franchises need to be viable by themselves, it should not take loads of extra cash from rich owners to make it happen

NJ is bleeding money
 

vanlady

Registered User
Nov 3, 2004
810
0
likea said:
NJ is not one of the have teams, they are bleeding money....bleeding

that is why they need a new arena and why they sold like they did, they are now owned by a rich owner who is taking a loss

NHL franchises need to be viable by themselves, it should not take loads of extra cash from rich owners to make it happen

NJ is bleeding money

No bank in there right mind is going to fund a capital cost project for any business bleeding money. Until you can give a business reason why a bank would fund an arena when the business is not bringing in any income, after they have already extended a 60 million line of credit to that organization, you have no evidence that the Devils are bleeding money.
 

SuperUnknown

Registered User
Mar 14, 2002
4,890
0
Visit site
vanlady said:
No bank in there right mind is going to fund a capital cost project for any business bleeding money. Until you can give a business reason why a bank would fund an arena when the business is not bringing in any income, after they have already extended a 60 million line of credit to that organization, you have no evidence that the Devils are bleeding money.

Maybe it's guaranteed by the owner (and not the team). Who knows...

There are companies out there with negative capital (in other words, they have more debts than they have assets) and yet they keep getting financed. :dunno:
 
Feb 28, 2002
10,922
0
Abbotsford, BC
Visit site
dakota said:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/

Looks like upto 15 owners are being told by their banks to get cost certainty or risk having their loans called...

this does not bode well for the players.. it tells me they do NEED cost certainty... now if the owners could get this and figure out another way to give the players something we may be ok.

This is a very positive sign that the NHL is not only telling the truth, but that the NHL financially is in deeper trouble than anyone could've guessed.

I am a financial advisor and let me tell you, If I called up someone to call their loan, it is only because I know they cannot meet their current income levels.

And if you think Banks do not know every single penny that is being counted, then you are really fooling yourselves.

No doubt the NHL planned to have this info leaked at this juncture in the negotiations, a smart tactic.

But the threat is real, and the players , especially Goodenow are just going to have to accept this.
 

rwilson99

Registered User
vanlady said:
No bank in there right mind is going to fund a capital cost project for any business bleeding money. Until you can give a business reason why a bank would fund an arena when the business is not bringing in any income, after they have already extended a 60 million line of credit to that organization, you have no evidence that the Devils are bleeding money.

The capital cost project is a piece of what the bankers feel is a plan to have the team fufill the current debt obligation. Part of that plan is cost certainty.
 

mr gib

Registered User
Sep 19, 2004
5,853
0
vancouver
www.bigtopkarma.com
likea said:
an article appeared in the business sports journal about a year and a half ago stating New Jersey was having a hard time getting loans because of how much dept they were already in compared to their revenues coming in.

New Jersey is one of the teams that needs a cap
to go with their 100 mill investment in the new arena - ( just kidding )
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
vanlady said:
No bank in there right mind is going to fund a capital cost project for any business bleeding money. Until you can give a business reason why a bank would fund an arena when the business is not bringing in any income, after they have already extended a 60 million line of credit to that organization, you have no evidence that the Devils are bleeding money.


ok, lets do this so you can understand it

the Caps, who had a payroll of 50 million to begin and end the 2002-2003 season lost 20-30 million with an attendence of 15, 787 per game

the Devils, averaged 14,858 per game in the same year they had a 56 million dollar payroll

you do the math
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
mr gib said:
to go with their 100 mill investment in the new arena - ( just kidding )


they need a new arena to try and turn things around

its a calculated investment
 

Anksun

Registered User
Dec 13, 2002
3,616
1
Montreal
Visit site
I agree with Biggest Canuck Fan,

I'm also completing some degree in financial at university and what you can say about the banks is that they really have the best system of RISK analysism out there.

Every bank have his own risk department and they dont call/ask for some more stability in your business for fun, that's for sure.
 

Boomhower

Registered User
Aug 23, 2003
5,169
1
Ontario
Visit site
likea said:
ok, lets do this so you can understand it

the Caps, who had a payroll of 50 million to begin and end the 2002-2003 season lost 20-30 million with an attendence of 15, 787 per game

the Devils, averaged 14,858 per game in the same year they had a 56 million dollar payroll

you do the math

If you think it's that simple than your kidding yourself. There are a lot of other factors that are just as, if not more important, than Attendance vs. Payroll.
 

Hockey_Nut99

Guest
Why does Lou get so much credit for being so smart when his payroll is around or over 60 million?
 

vanlady

Registered User
Nov 3, 2004
810
0
Smail said:
The buyer from McMullen at $175M sold it for significantly less than that after. As in, recent transaction, capital loss...

Now I know you are full of hot air, the current owner was part of the original Yankee Nets deal in 2000 and only bought out Yankee net and the rest of the investors. The transfer as a matter of fact was approved Sept 15, lockout day, jeez wonder why?

Oh and if they are bleeding red that bad where are they getting the 100 million to finance the arena deal?
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
Boomhower said:
If you think it's that simple than your kidding yourself. There are a lot of other factors that are just as, if not more important, than Attendance vs. Payroll.


I know its not as simple as that, you have to look at luxery boxes, advertising, ect..ect..

but who do you think gets the big companies....the Rangers or the Devils

Madision square garden or that crap of an arena the devils play in

NHL is an attendence base sport....
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
vanlady said:
Now I know you are full of hot air, the current owner was part of the original Yankee Nets deal in 2000 and only bought out Yankee net and the rest of the investors. The transfer as a matter of fact was approved Sept 15, lockout day, jeez wonder why?

Oh and if they are bleeding red that bad where are they getting the 100 million to finance the arena deal?


are they paying that 100 million right now??? are they paying it all in one year

they plan to pay it over time with the new arena money
 

vanlady

Registered User
Nov 3, 2004
810
0
likea said:
are they paying that 100 million right now??? are they paying it all in one year

they plan to pay it over time with the new arena money

That 100 million is the Devils percentage of the constuction costs, so yes it will be due and payable now.
 

likea

Registered User
Jul 9, 2004
599
0
vanlady said:
That 100 million is the Devils percentage of the constuction costs, so yes it will be due and payable now.


so you think the government pays its 200 million off right away too...lol

I have ocean front property in Iowa I want to sell ya
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad