IcedCapp
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2009
- 35,933
- 11,544
Rangers filled their first thread hours ago. This doesn't bode well.
Damn, we really are losers.
Rangers filled their first thread hours ago. This doesn't bode well.
not that I don't want to win game 1, but I always thought game 2 was the key.
Is it true the Pens had the #1 score-adjusted fenwick in the league over the last 25 games?
Heard it on the radio, not sure if I trust it. If true, it's sort of really predictive in the long run.
Pens have been the best in the last 25 games. (You can play with how many games and looking at Corsi and Fenwick with different adjustments here.)
Their biggest problem has been a very low shooting percentage. The low shooting percentage appears to be highly correlated to the injuries (using man games lost).
On one hand, the Pens should expect to have their shooting percentage move towards league (and their own) average in X amount of games. However, it is not certain that X amount of games will be enough for a 7 game series. And on the other hand, if the low shooting percentage is related to injuries than the recovery of Malkin will be important as is the lack of Letang.
Just pointing out again. They were playing almost exclusively non-playoff teams during that period. Unless I am mistaken the Rangers made the playoffs, so I am not sure how relevant those numbers are even if they are a fair reflection of play.
Given the total lack of roster change at forward, I don't like our chances this series.
It was always going to be a long shot, but we've chosen to do everything exactly the same as we did during our epic slide.
The Islanders kicking Washington's butt, Calgary winning their game, the Sens being VERY close...can the Pens shock the world too? We shall see.
Here's the thing. Can we? Yes. Yes we can. This team can choose to "flip the switch" any time it damn well pleases. If this team "WANTS" to...it can demolish the Rangers.
Here's the issue: it will take EVERY player making the decision to play for 60 MINUTES. Historically speaking...that is very unlikely to happen.
Is it true the Pens had the #1 score-adjusted fenwick in the league over the last 25 games?
Heard it on the radio, not sure if I trust it. If true, it's sort of really predictive in the long run.
Didn't we also suck in the last 25 games...like bottom feeder suck...
Hopefully, we can finish chances tn though. Horny, Flower and Martin are the 3 guys I'm watching tn to see if we can actually pull off a miracle.
If Horny isn't in front of that net, we are ****ed.
If Flower isn't MVP like for this series, we are beyond ****ed.
Martin is the only PMD we have that I trust right now, so he better show up
We have five wins in our last 17 games:
- at home vs. Edm (when we blew a 4-0 lead and won late)
- at AZ
- at home vs. AZ
- at home vs. SJ (shootout)
- at Buf
We're not playing a non-playoff team.
With how deep Lundqvist stays in his net, I wonder if that will make Hornqvist even more effective. He might be able to get right in the crease at times.
Does feel kind of nice being underdogs for once though I will say. No expectations on this team, if we lose in 4 nobody will be shocked. Nothing to lose, should be less stressful to watch than usual.
With how deep Lundqvist stays in his net, I wonder if that will make Hornqvist even more effective. He might be able to get right in the crease at times.
Pens have been the best in the last 25 games. (You can play with how many games and looking at Corsi and Fenwick with different adjustments here.)
Their biggest problem has been a very low shooting percentage. The low shooting percentage appears to be highly correlated to the injuries (using man games lost).
On one hand, the Pens should expect to have their shooting percentage move towards league (and their own) average in X amount of games. However, it is not certain that X amount of games will be enough for a 7 game series. And on the other hand, if the low shooting percentage is related to injuries than the recovery of Malkin will be important as is the lack of Letang.
Does feel kind of nice being underdogs for once though I will say. No expectations on this team, if we lose in 4 nobody will be shocked. Nothing to lose, should be less stressful to watch than usual.
Well that's illegal but what it might to is cause Lundqvist to come out a bit and play out of his comfort zone.
The Pens "sucked" due to a very low shooting percentage (converting on their chances) and more shots against (compared to the previous 10 games before) and lower save percentage
Most of those stats are highly correlated to injuries (MGL) and likely explained by decrease of talent on the blueline and fatigue of the remaining defenders playing with 5 men. Injuries to Malkin are also likely a factor.
None of the stats say that the Pens are going to win, but they do suggest that the Pens are a better team than the last part of the season showcased.
We have five wins in our last 17 games:
- at home vs. Edm (when we blew a 4-0 lead and won late)
- at AZ
- at home vs. AZ
- at home vs. SJ (shootout)
- at Buf
We're not playing a non-playoff team.