Thanks for all the info, Doc. Hard for me to look stuff up, I'm basically relegated to audio stuff for all but a few minutes at a time.
Still think this is Rangers in a walk, but I guess I leave more room to "if they can get healthy, maybe..."
Not a problem. I had some tabs open.
Rangers are definitely the favorites. They have the better record, better goaltending (by sv%), better shooting (by sh%), are healthier, and have more depth (even when the Pens are healthy).
The Pens actually have some advantages (in spite of the doom and gloom talk). They have better shot differentials, better special teams (even if the PP is not great), and have Crosby and Malkin.
If the Pens can take advantage of their advantages especially special teams and get a little "lucky" in shooting percentage then the series gets a little more interesting.
What do those stats say about playing without a coach, or coaching staff, for the last half decade?
I don't know or rather the stats don't know either.
PDO is the sum of a team's even strength shooting percentage and even strength save percentage. On average (across teams and players) it measures random variability (or luck) and has a normal range (0.98-1.02 or close to that) over a large number of games. Over a smaller number of games, factors like home/road games, injuries, and SOS play a role. Having a low PDO over a large number of games (see Buffalo) is suggestive of lack of talent and/or coaching issues (line-up and usage, systems, adjustments). Having a high PDO over a large number of games is suggestive of high talent and/or good coaching. (
Source 1,
Source 2)
In the Pens case, having a low PDO over a small number of games might be injuries. But I still have reservations about Johnston's offensive systems and how they might actually have some responsibility for the lower shooting percentage (which is currently masked by injuries). Looking at Crosby's numbers this year, it seems as though a possibility is there.