What do the bolded and underlined players emphasize?
Yep people keep bring g up his none draft year stats.a lot of scouts were using the word project for hIm and some teams had him as late 3rd pick.the Q is a wild west show fir numbers and for every Sid the kid there are 100 Angelo Espositos who show how soft scoring numbers cam be in the Q.
Funny, how people talk about "how sad" when pro athletes who have made millions of dollars, just "don't have it" to become long term NHLers.
Remember some Toronto writer, years ago saying "how sad" it was that Eric Lindros had never won a Stanley Cup. Gee, 35 million Canadians have never won the Stanley Cup and all them don't feel sad.
Saad and Jenner come to mind, but they weren't considered top 5-10 talent like Forsberg or Grigorenko
Funny, how people talk about "how sad" when pro athletes who have made millions of dollars, just "don't have it" to become long term NHLers.
Remember some Toronto writer, years ago saying "how sad" it was that Eric Lindros had never won a Stanley Cup. Gee, 35 million Canadians have never won the Stanley Cup and all them don't feel sad.
He had terrible knee injuries. My buddy trained with him a few years ago and said that he was unbelievably slow. For example, my buddy was faster than Chris Neil, and Chris Neil was apparently way faster than Angelo Esposito. Still had unreal hands, but just couldnt move around the ice at all.
people just love trying to look right after the fact.
i remember, with each pick, getting more shocked and surprised, "how has nobody taken this kid yet??"
that was the talk that day, regarding Esposito. He was simply projected to go better than he did.
Being a Habs fan, you knew something was very wrong when Montreal of all teams passed by him for a goalie with the number 5 pick. It only got worse from there. That whole day was almost focused on who would draft AE.
Wrong year.
I remember wondering awhile back about Esposito if there was ever another player whose points/game peaked in their rookie year in junior AND got worse every year after that.I remember this clear as day.
When he was an underage Rookie in the Q, he was projected to be 1st Overall.
He had 98 points in 57 games. ASTOUNDING point totals for a rookie.
(His totals inflated by an overage Radulov who had 152 points in 62 games).
In Esposito's draft year. He regressed down to 79 points in 60 games, and was no longer a lock for 1st. It's a HUGE red herring when a players numbers regress like that. It often means their game peaked in Jr, and further emphasized his anomalous numbers purely relied on Radulov's dominance.
The shocking part was when he regressed even more in his overage year (This was when Pittsburgh cut it off with him).
Esposito peaked as a rookie in the Q.
Same story as Dany Roussin's reliance on Sidney Crosby.
You're right. My bad. Still remember going crazy when the Habs didn't draft him though given he had fallen.
Why did Pens drafted him? As i know, he was/is center. At the time of the draft, Pens had 3 elite looking centers - Crosby, Malkin and in the making Jordan Staal.
Why did they pick another one?
Funny, how people talk about "how sad" when pro athletes who have made millions of dollars, just "don't have it" to become long term NHLers.
Remember some Toronto writer, years ago saying "how sad" it was that Eric Lindros had never won a Stanley Cup. Gee, 35 million Canadians have never won the Stanley Cup and all them don't feel sad.