SoupNazi
Serenity now. Insanity later.
- Feb 6, 2010
- 26,425
- 14,604
@OgeeOgelthorpe Cuz he gets a point every 5 games? We have that with Zadina...
None of that does anything. Sounds like Islander hockey which is f'n gross.Yes, but Zadina doesn’t hit or stand up for his teammates or drive the net. Greenway can do other stuff realgud too.
None of that does anything. Sounds like Islander hockey which is f'n gross.
We sucked in OT. Were chasing the entire time. They didn't play Ed at all. Big body, great skater could have helped with our possession. I get it he's young but this is literally a meaningless game. Perfect time to get that experience. Chariot shouldn't be out in ot over ed that's poor coaching.
Ray doesn't need weight. He's sturdy and uses his leverage well. You saw it all the time last season. For some reason he's been less willing to get physically engaged this season.Razor played well and I like his game when he is involved more physically. He needs some more weight to throw around, but he seems like he could be a scrapper. Mo played well too. He has so many multiple point games, if he (and the team) can develop some more consistency it will be scary
Ray doesn't need weight. He's sturdy and uses his leverage well. You saw it all the time last season. For some reason he's been less willing to get physically engaged this season.
In the regular season, I wonder if a 30 second shot clock in OT would help (with a delay of game penalty).What you watched there is a perfect example of how shitty OT is when you allow teams to retain possession retreating out of the offensive zone.
It wasn’t that we played bad as much as it was the Buffalo was content not attacking
Its clear as day that these kids need to fill and get their man strength. You definitely notice it up close and personal. I loved the compete though, so at least theyre willing. Id have to say this was the best game Ive seen in person, only thing to make it better would have been a win. Still, this game had a little bit of everything so it was a great night for the family!View attachment 683267View attachment 683268
I watched the same OT. He is right and you're wrong.What you watched there is a perfect example of how shitty OT is when you allow teams to retain possession retreating out of the offensive zone.
It wasn’t that we played bad as much as it was the Buffalo was content not attacking
I watched the same OT. He is right and you're wrong.
Buffalo played a nearly perfect OT, doing everything but scoring.
All I can say is the #89 in Buffalo uniform should be Alexander Mogilny.
And when I see Chiarot in the offensive zone (where he doesn't belong), I can't help but think of Larionov or, worse case scenario, Abdelkader.
I have just about reached a breaking point with 3 on 3. It's just not good to watch. Over and back type of rule sounds decent, but what are we proposing happens when you do it? A penalty? A whistle and faceoff? Penalty seems too severe. Faceoff seems maybe not severe enough where teams may still voluntarily take it at times, and make OT more unwatchableJust add an over and back rule. Ken said something like "I don't know how you do that". Well just do it, it's a simple rule and it's guaranteed to work. I don't see the problem.
Treat it like icing.I have just about reached a breaking point with 3 on 3. It's just not good to watch. Over and back type of rule sounds decent, but what are we proposing happens when you do it? A penalty? A whistle and faceoff? Penalty seems too severe. Faceoff seems maybe not severe enough where teams may still voluntarily take it at times, and make OT more unwatchable
just go back to 5v5, and let it end in a tie if no one scores.