joshjull
Registered User
I’m assuming it’s two way but haven’t seen confirmation yet.
Last edited:
Curious why you think its odd?
He is a a young power forward who was drafted by us and we were patient with and it is paying off in the form of a quality AHL player, why not offer two years? He wouldn't be a FA after a two year deal if I recall.Curious why you think its odd?
I doubt that.Wouldn't shock me if this is his last year in our system. I can easily see him being non-tendered next year.
Great Roch guy and call up. Has size few in the org do, and he got here the hard way. Tough not to respect that.
Quality payday for a guy who is not that far removed from coming to camp as an unsigned invitee and earning an AHL-level deal. He's a serious underdog, always nice to see someone getting a reward for their work and persistence.
Love his size. Wish he would use it. Good for him but unless he wakes up at the NHL level he is destined to be a lifer in the AHL. Nothing wrong with that. Better way to make a living than my office job for sure but I see so much potential with him and then he plays so soft up here. It's rather disappointing.
Hopefully the bulb goes on.
It's not how he plays regardlessIt's not a lightbulb, it's the footspeed to catch people to hit. He's not able to hit what he can't catch, so he doesn't.
It's not how he plays regardless
It's not how he plays regardless
This is not effective, efficient or economical.I wonder if Murray sticks out of camp as the 13/14 forward and it pushes Bjork to Rochester?
I would say that Murray might be way more effective and efficient than Bjork in 22/23.This is not effective, efficient or economical.
Doesn't matter. Pegula says that's not economical.I would say that Murray might be way more effective and efficient than Bjork in 22/23.