Novacain
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2012
- 4,362
- 4,875
That was a terribad goal for Lehner to give up after how he played for 64 and change minutes
I blame the D for letting Tara-Freaking-Senko get a 1 on none on the goalie out of nowhere.
That was a terribad goal for Lehner to give up after how he played for 64 and change minutes
that explains alotLmao this is great. Doesn't see the GDT because the user is blocked. Classic.
No, we're sisters.Are you Majorityof1's long lost cousin?
He got burned over committing to the poke check.I blame the D for letting Tara-Freaking-Senko get a 1 on none on the goalie out of nowhere.
Sabres fan here, coming in peace.
Great game.
And now you have witnessed what we Buffalo fans are dealing with. Its pretty much the same every game. We have a long way to go.
Anyways, good win and good luck in your playoff run.
It wasn’t that Eichel got burned so much as Kane neglected to cover the middle of the ice! Eichel should have been fine making the play he did at the blue line because he SHOULD have had support from his teammates, particularly Kane.He got burned over committing to the poke check.
No, we're sisters.
Spoilers! They hadn't even dropped the puck in the Blues end yet when I read this.
I'm guessing because he slammed his stick against the net and broke it after Tarasenko scored? That would be the only reason I could see, although you see that happen quite often with players so not sure why it warranted a misconduct. I definitely agree that Kane was mostly at fault there, Eichel thought he had support behind him but Kane peeled off to cover the middle of the ice which gave Tarasenko the open lane.Why did Eichel get a 10m misconduct in OT?