Prov1X
Registered User
Was at a QMJHL game last night and the following took place, and still thinking the wrong call was made, but I could possibly be wrong (more than likely I am).
Home team is on a penalty kill and get a short handed breakaway, player goes in and shoots, which looked like it was in but referree says no goal. The play continues, and the power play expires, but a new penalty is called on the home team. So during the stoppage, the play is reviewed and it is determined that it was indeed a goal.
So my thought was that the play goes back to the time of the goal, which would put the original penalty back into the box. This is where I disagree with the officials, the second penalty was still awarded, so now the home team was down 2 men. I always was under the impression that because they went back, the second penalty was not assessed because technically it did not happen.
What's the rule? Or everyone's opinion?
Home team is on a penalty kill and get a short handed breakaway, player goes in and shoots, which looked like it was in but referree says no goal. The play continues, and the power play expires, but a new penalty is called on the home team. So during the stoppage, the play is reviewed and it is determined that it was indeed a goal.
So my thought was that the play goes back to the time of the goal, which would put the original penalty back into the box. This is where I disagree with the officials, the second penalty was still awarded, so now the home team was down 2 men. I always was under the impression that because they went back, the second penalty was not assessed because technically it did not happen.
What's the rule? Or everyone's opinion?