OMG67 you are barking up the wrong tree if you think I have no respect for Canadian traditions. My father fought in France as an 18 year old. My father in law in Italy at the same age. Many other relatives were in some form of military. Royals never fought in a war but have more medals hanging on their chest than you can count. Times have changed. If you feel the need to have a portrait of a royal in a Canadian arena more power to you. 60% of Canadians really feel the need to end our relationship with the royal family. We have bigger fish to fry in Canada than worrying about having a picture of an elite person hanging in the rafters when we watch a hockey game. As I said before I would rather have a Canadian flag. You are entitled to your opinion.
I’m 100% fine with your explanation. I am 100% fine with your alternative. The issue I am more pointing to are those that reject it based on the reasons I am referring to. I painted you with that brush and based on your explanation, that wasn’t accurate.
Personally, I don’t think arenas are the most appropriate place for a Royal Portrait except for the fact it has become traditional to do so because the arenas are a public space. As a Public space, there is tradition behind hanging portraits of the Royal Family. This would be similar in the USA hanging a portrait of George Washington etc. or the current sitting President.
The value of the Royal family is in the tenets associated to historical tradition. The Royal Family is a Constitutional Monarchy. They don’t have any real power In law. But their value lies in maintaining a bridge to the traditions of the past which, IMO, are important. We need high profile entities that people pay attention to so as to maintain tradition. They are that entity. If we were to rid ourselves of that entity, it would then be on whom to point to for tradition? The family? The Government? The Legal System? I’m not sure any of those entities have the same power to bring people together for the purpose of maintaining tradition.
That is how I look at it and I don’t differ in opinion from you either. I just feel there is space for both and there is value in both. We need to respect our long standing traditions while also recognizing the sacrifices of those that have helped to maintain those traditions and our way of life. Without the traditions that have helped to shape our way of life, what is there that is worth the sacrifice of fighting for it?
When the National Anthem plays and we face the flag or the Portrait of the sitting Monarch or both, we pledge to respect our traditions and what those symbols represent. It is true that some don’t respect the Monarchy and that is fine but there are also people that don’t respect the flag either. I think they both go hand in hand. We can ditch the Monarchy in the short term but I am not too certain we would be better off in the long term. That is assuming the Monarchy is able to be the bridge to the traditions of the past. Recent events suggest that may be a challenge. As such, my opinion may change as events surrounding that Royal Family change. The direct lineage looks like it may be ok but the periphery is a challenge for sure.