Just find your definition of evidence quaint.
Here is what you said just a few words upthread.
"
Still a bottom line issue. The goals that are allowed. Regardless of whether reflected by SV% or GAA
the type and quality of goals allowed is the real issue. If a goalie has stretches of bad games
or gives up bad goals this has to be recognized and weighed against his contemporaries."
Those are YOUR words. Not mine.
As it turns out, the "type and quality of goals allowed" was indeed a real issue for Durnan in respect to how the Habs' 1949 season ended. That is a fact, no spin necessary.
Yet Durnan gets the blame due to your superficial research and spin.
For one thing, he deserves the blame on that goal.
Also, I find it a little irritating that you're accusing me of orchestrating bias against Durnan. I have already supported your side of the argument in regard to his 1947 playoff, and even backed off of my
very light criticism of his 1945.
So I report that, on a factual basis, he lets in one bad goal in 1949, and you think it's ok to slag the research I put into it -- research that
you indicated a need to see -- and now it's ok to attack not the substance of the debate by my personal integrity? Seriously?
If you want to present research to provide even more depth to the subject, feel free. You may recall that in my prior post
I offered to share the workload with you. But coming after me personally because you made some unfounded comments and got called on the carpet -- I'm not ok with that, at all.
First thoughts are supposed to have some grounding in facts and research. As evidenced above, this is not the case.
What in the holy hell are you talking about? The full text of the post you're referring to:
"My reflex reaction is that Benedict, Broda and Parent are the weakest candidates here.
Agreed that Brodeur, Sawchuk, Dryden are a notch above the pack.
In my mind that leaves Brimsek, Durnan and Tretiak to fight over the 4th spot."
In what way did that post signal anything other than my initial reaction to seeing the list? What does it have to do with anything we're talking about here?