haseoke39
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2011
- 13,938
- 2,491
I don't do draisaitl just because those are still lottery picks until you fix the D, and now you're walking into 18-19 with a huge cap problem.
I don't do draisaitl just because those are still lottery picks until you fix the D, and now you're walking into 18-19 with a huge cap problem.
As I said above 8.75 to Drais for me is the max, 9.0-9.5 to Eichel when his time comes. Doubt he's exactly angry at that lol He's supposed to be a "winner" so Im sure he would understand what having Draisaitl on our team makes us. If you are desperate, trade Reinhart when his time for new contract comes and you can't fit him on acceptable to him contract. I take Drais over Reinhart on my team any day.
I honestly don't know if Edmonton matches 8.75 4-5 years (whatever gets him to non UFA status) and also I don't know if it is of interest to Drais as he may prefer longer, slightly lower contract and stay in Edmonton anyway. But as I said, we got nothing to lose
Refer to Drai's current team and how they are a lottery team You are forgetting, no more Disco Dan.
Do you remember how the locker room reacted to signing Ehrhoff and Leino to big money deals? No thanks.
Don't forget Hall for Larsson. Edmonton's top three of Larsson, Sekera, and Nurse is better than the top three of Ristolainen and McCabe.
Do you remember how the locker room reacted to signing Ehrhoff and Leino to big money deals? No thanks.
Don't forget Hall for Larsson. Edmonton's top three of Larsson, Sekera, and Nurse is better than the top three of Ristolainen and McCabe.
I don't do draisaitl just because those are still lottery picks until you fix the D, and now you're walking into 18-19 with a huge cap problem.
I wouldn't do draisaitl but I'd have to think if you are sheeting him it's because Reinhart is moving for D.
There's that too, if Big Botts finds out he can get a decent D that wouldn't require more than 5-6 mil cap hit for Reinhart, I want him to be all over Drais's offer sheet.
I still don't want to be all over an over sheet that big
9M for a guy that's never been more than a 2nd fiddle on an NHL level line is not something I except someone of Botterill's calibre to do.
9M for a guy that's never been more than a 2nd fiddle on an NHL level line is not something I except someone of Botterill's calibre to do.
Cheaper ones I'd go only D or winger, don't think we need to ffer sheet a C unless he's elite.
Pasta for Eichel's wing? Not sure at what point Bruins give up, but I assume it would be lower than Drais.
I'd also love to have Burakovskyi if we are going Wingers as I'm a big fan, but doubt he's on the radar...but he shouldn't be that expensive as his point totals are not great.
That coming from the ultimate defender of all things Reinhart? Drais has done much more than Reinhart in similar position. He's got every ability to be elite 2C behind Eichel unlike Reinhart and step up in case of injury to be elite 1C (just like Syd and Malkin in Pitts). Then ROR could move to the wing or 3C depending what coach wants to do with the lines (I know some here want three scoring lines and some want to see ROR on Eichel's wing).
????
Just so I have this clear
Our GM, who gushed about our top two centers (ROR/Eichel) as well as our overall strength at center. That guy is going to make an absurd offerhseet to get Draisaitl?
Oh boy.
You know exactly what I mean so I'm not going to bother explaining.
He was the only true centre I put on the initial list (Faksa maybe too but much lower profile) People want elite centres, fakt. If he has a chance to get Drais, I doubt he turns dorn the chance even if we have ROR and Eichel. 3 is more than 2 and apparently he likes flexibility. Both ROR and Drais have shown they can play on wing quite effectively previously. Once again - I'd rather target Parayko if we are going after elite talent.
He was the only true centre I put on the initial list (Faksa maybe too but much lower profile) People want elite centres, fakt. If he has a chance to get Drais, I doubt he turns dorn the chance even if we have ROR and Eichel. 3 is more than 2 and apparently he likes flexibility. Both ROR and Drais have shown they can play on wing quite effectively previously. Once again - I'd rather target Parayko if we are going after elite talent.
Klefbom tho
So our locker room would rather be 8th from bottom, rather than 8 from top? I hope they have enough brains to figure out that bringing a superstar young stud gets them in the playoffs where many of them have never even played. Doubt you see many complaints. It's not like we have many underpayed players (Risto maybe but not really compared to other D recently signed in the league).
Yes Edmonton's D is slightly better than ours, but we can get some help in the 2 to 4 mil range to help out this offseason. Also some of what we have already may not be as absolutely terrible as it was under Disco. I have slight hope of this, but it is possibility.
EDIT: Also I did say, I'd rather Parayko over Drais but won't say no to Drais if we can nab him.
Your I fantasyland if you think our GM will be throwing around offersheets. I think your interpretation of his comments are like the ones about Sam and wing. You heard what you wanted to hear and ran with it.
Just so I have this clear
Our GM, who gushed about our top two centers (ROR/Eichel) as well as our overall strength at center. That guy is going to make an absurd offersheet to get Draisaitl?
Oh boy.
Forgot. Good catch.
The Sabres current locker room won't be bottom 8 much longer. Most of that was Bylsma, and the rest of the defense.
Bringing in Draisaitl at that price isn't the answer. You'll shatter the locker room. No one is going to see a second year center with one good year making that type of money as fair. There's only one player in the league that flies for: McDavid. Draisaitl won't lift the Sabres into the playoffs.
And the Oiler defense isn't slightly better. It's better, no modifier, and that's even forgetting Klefbom.
Why go the RFA route with Parayko? Just build around Ristolainen?