Kudo Shinichi
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2012
- 20,572
- 26,700
Yes he definitely is. He’s already proved himself and it’s only the beginning. If we wanna start building some certainty on this team then it’s a good idea to lock him up.Is Romanov really worth investing eight years? Isn't it strange for a rebuilding team to sign players for that long knowing there will be so much uncertainty to come?
I do realize this he was a top 4 on the worst team in the league, and I might be in the minority here but I also think he's shown that he's a legitimate top 4D (or better) in the making and if Romanov as a player believes this too, then he has absolutely no reason to settle on an 8 year over a bridge.
I'm sure he realizes he'll be closer to a top 4D in 2 years than he is now, thus earning him better money in 2 years. If he thinks he's plateau'd or simply wants security because he's not risk adverse then sure, he'll take that 8 years contract like KK did.
That being said, I also don't think Hughes should throw an 8 year his way as well. Give him 2 more years to prove himself.
Well obviously I'm exaggerating in this case, but I'm eager to be educated on Romanov. You say he was "handling" his minutes. I say he was drowning more often than not. What am I not seeing with this kid?
Well to start, let's look at his minutes. He played more total and PK minutes over the year than any other skater on the whole team. As a 21/22 year old.
Meanwhile he was on the first PK unit, and had next to no PP time, with guys like Clague playing 3 times his total PP minutes in 1/4 his TOI. He also had the lowest OZ start% on the team.
It got to the point where I wondered if they were intentionally holding him in a wasted year to sign him more easily this summer.
He was 6th league wide in hits this year (among Dmen) and dominated all other Habs Dmen in total and per game (guys like Chiarot, Edmundson, Savard - not fairies).
Top 20 league-wide in blocked shots and 1st on the team while all of Petry, Edmundson, and Savard (and Clague, and Kulak) had a higher giveaway/60.
All at 21/22, with significantly improving advanced statistics after hiring MSL.
I'd say he's the perfect candidate for a long term deal, because his positive qualities are more subtle and he shouldn't command the price more accurately portrayed by his impact.
That's a very good contract for both parties.I'd sign him 8yrs x 32M$
In my eyes, he's proven......get him long term, he's a keeper
$256 million is still a lot of money. I would shoot for a bit less.I'd sign him 8yrs x 32M$
In my eyes, he's proven......get him long term, he's a keeper
We must avoid the Bergevin mistakes, where we ended up with a team that was in last place but over the cap.You realise that this top-4 role was on the worst team in the league and he was regularly exposed in this role? We might as well played Corey Schueneman in this role, or Kulak and it wouldn't make any difference. It sure doesn't mean we should be paying any of them north of $1,5M on a 2-year deal.
Ya, should’ve omitted the “x” lol$256 million is still a lot of money. I would shoot for a bit less.
We also need to not duplicate an NHL record 731 man games lost like we did last year….think that has something to do with us stinking so bad.We must avoid the Bergevin mistakes, where we ended up with a team that was in last place but over the cap.
For Habs to be a contender, prime Romanov would have to be a 3D or better yet 4D. His salary plan should get him there in a few years. There has to be room for 2-3 guys more expensive than him.
Lmfao! Until Colorado picks him up and his offensive stats increase by a magnitude while still playing solid defensively…What's the upside?
He's not playing PP, so he's not going to rack up points.
Absolute best case for a shutdown D is a Lindell/Pelech type contract at 5.5-6. And most are in the 5 million range. With some like Pesce/Carlo at 4.
You really going to gamble 30 million guaranteed, that you may never see if you get injured/suck, for 1 million AAV (8 million total/4 after tax)?
I understand for Caufield, who could score 40 next year and raise his AAV by 3 million, but not Romanov. The market for that type of D is pretty set.
To put it into perspective - Romanov is 6 months older than Harris.... And a whole lot further down the development road. He's a guy that is feared throughout the league for his massive hits, and he's only gotten better with more responsibility. It's tough to believe that this will only be his third season in Montreal coming up, because it feels like he's a young veteran.
I'd bridge him at this point - 2.5 Million per for the next 3 years - before signing him long term on his next deal. He gets a significant raise but doesn't go past the vets, Montreal retains his RFA rights, and he can play himself into an impressive deal if he performs, or the Habs can sign him to a smaller deal if he doesn't improve. Win win situation for all involved.