If his AHL salary was $90k, it would have to be at least that in his next Qualified Offer. Now they can QO him with $70k AHL salary next year.The contract will pay McKeown $700,000 at the NHL level and $70,000 at the AHL level with a $90,000 guarantee.
Not sure what the advantage of doing 700/70 with 90 guarantee vs just doing 700/90...
Can't wait to see how the 5-7D slots pan out through camp.
I'm still puzzled why Haydn Fleury gets a one-way deal and inside track on an NHL job, while this guy is basically on the outside looking in, when they are the same age, same draft class, and have accomplished basically the same amount as pros. I guess the lesson here is to get drafted in the first round, even if you don't deserve it.
I'm still puzzled why Haydn Fleury gets a one-way deal and inside track on an NHL job, while this guy is basically on the outside looking in, when they are the same age, same draft class, and have accomplished basically the same amount as pros. I guess the lesson here is to get drafted in the first round, even if you don't deserve it.
I get what you are saying, but Fleury has played 87 NHL games, 67 two seasons ago mainly in the top 4 as Faulks partner. McKeown has a grand total of 10 NHL games in a very sheltered role.
Fleury has played in the NHL on regular-ish basis in 17/18 and served full 5 years in Entry-level system like a trooper.I'm still puzzled why Haydn Fleury gets a one-way deal and inside track on an NHL job, while this guy is basically on the outside looking in, when they are the same age, same draft class, and have accomplished basically the same amount as pros. I guess the lesson here is to get drafted in the first round, even if you don't deserve it.
It's hard to believe we were really that bad two seasons ago. We also got 75 games from Joakim Nordstrom, 71 from Victor Rask, 49 from Phil DiGiuseppe, 48 from Marcus Kruger, 37 from Lee Stempniak, 33 from Klas Dahlbeck and 31 from Josh Jooris.
Fleury's 0-8--8, minus-2 production didn't even stand out as particularly horrible in that context.
Yeah, I wasn’t trying to comment on Fleury’s play, just explaining why he probably got a one way deal vs. McKeownThey probably both suck in anything but a sheltered, depth role.
Good depth signing. His career would probably be better served on a team that needs Defencemen though.
McKeown is a solid #10.
Fleury has played in the NHL on regular-ish basis in 17/18 and served full 5 years in Entry-level system like a trooper.
He was eligible for two-way QO with ~$875k NHL salary, but apparently let it expire on the regular date of July 15 and signed the very next day for lesser salary of $850k one-way.
Maybe the de Haan trade with Priskie trade falling through and them liking him probably got him earmarked for the third pair. We don't know what took so long in signing McKeown, was is dependent on Williams or what.
Yeah, I wasn’t trying to comment on Fleury’s play, just explaining why he probably got a one way deal vs. McKeown
What I don't get is why McKeown didn't get some of those 97 unimpressive games that Fleury got to see if he had something to offer.
Because Peters was a righteous disciple of the Babcock school of “Handedness” when it comes to defense.
(waiting for Sens1Canes2 to like this post)Speaking of Babcock, as a Canes fan I can't wait to see him play 22+ minutes of Cody Ceci because he's right-handed