vadardog
Registered User
- May 29, 2004
- 53
- 0
I don't know why PA types would want revenue sharing. If they accept a linked or caped deal (which they almost certainly will) then revenue sharing will take dollars out of their pocket.
Lets say a CBA is signed which includes 50% revenue sharing. I believe this will lead to teams spending less on promoting the game and other activities.
Example: NYR go out and do a study which suggest that if they spend 1 million on advertising they will make 2 million more in revenues. After they revenue share 50% they break even.
Example 2: Edm believes that if they update concessions at a cost of 1.5 million that they will bring in 2.5 million more in revenues. After they give out 1.25 million in revenue sharing they get to loose 250,000$ for their efforts.
Lets say a CBA is signed which includes 50% revenue sharing. I believe this will lead to teams spending less on promoting the game and other activities.
Example: NYR go out and do a study which suggest that if they spend 1 million on advertising they will make 2 million more in revenues. After they revenue share 50% they break even.
Example 2: Edm believes that if they update concessions at a cost of 1.5 million that they will bring in 2.5 million more in revenues. After they give out 1.25 million in revenue sharing they get to loose 250,000$ for their efforts.