- Jul 25, 2012
- 40,336
- 35,619
Its to the point where id consider this depending on the prospect.Kesler + 2020 1st + prospect to Detroit this offseason for future considerations
Its to the point where id consider this depending on the prospect.Kesler + 2020 1st + prospect to Detroit this offseason for future considerations
For the right price sure, but it would prob be at the draft not the deadline.Is there really a chance that Fowler can be move ?
For the right price sure, but it would prob be at the draft not the deadline.
A few teams would prob be in on him I assume. Were you in the thread the other day, I think Anaheim fans said Mete + Olofsson + 1st... but montreal fans were a lil skeptical on moving mete(cuase they want to add a ld to mete, not create the same hole they are trying to fix), very understandable.If he is MTL need to be on this case
A few teams would prob be in on him I assume. Were you in the thread the other day, I think Anaheim fans said Mete + Olofsson + 1st... but montreal fans were a lil skeptical on moving mete(cuase they want to add a ld to mete, not create the same hole they are trying to fix), very understandable.
if we do move fowler its likely a sign that we are going to retool/build and a package of young assets would be great. Duck fans wanted a left handed dmen to replace fowler(which is why they asked for mete)… but at this point im okay just fallin down the standings a bit and having a few extra picks this season.
Olofsson + 1st + prospect/young player
for
fowler
id be looking at something like that, I just don't know much about montreal prospect pool outside of olofsson(someone I was hoping the ducks would snag at the draft)
Mete 1st and olofsson … id say yes right now... if mete isn't part of the deal depends who the 3rd piece is.I would be interested in this deal ! And for me Mete can be included in a deal for Fowler
Mete 1st and olofsson … id say yes right now... if mete isn't part of the deal depends who the 3rd piece is.
Like I said I understand montreal fans wanting to keep mete so they can have 2 good left dmen…. so idk who else they could potentially put in instead of mete.
But if your cool with mete being in the deal then I can say I accept
Well could def see a deal to be made.Maybe not Mete + Olofsson + 1st that I'm not ready but in a other type of deal I could inclued Mete
Thats basicly it, If Getzlaf gets hurt then not having Steel or Lundestrom hurts the team alot. If Mahura or Larsson aren't around, well our Dmen keep getting hurt every year so that depth is needed.Best prospect doesn't mean most important, id argue Larsson, Steel, Lundestrum and mahura are important than terry and comtois,... but as of right now id say terry and comtois are better than those 4.
But there is scenarios I could see Terry being on the table, but the way this team has looked/going id rather just hold on to all our young players and add more talent/picks and get ready for when those contracts come off the books.
Probably but I’m not really interested in trading him yet unless it’s an overpaymentWould Aberg have any value now that he's shown some offense?
Fair enough. I was just curious as they got him for free anyway.Probably but I’m not really interested in trading him yet unless it’s an overpayment