I'd say, hallelujah they got rid of that moronic offside review. Because even so, even if God herself came down and said, hey, if it wasn't for that six inches, a defenseman would've barely gotten a stick on that player, just enough to disrupt their concentration so that the goal never happens, IDGAF because I live in a universe full of acceptable errors.
And that error is, overall, one of the least likely to effect the outcome of a game. I'm more concerned about whether we do video review of every face-off to see who cheats. I'm more concerned about whether we check every stick for illegal curve. I'm more concerned about whether every guy has their mouthguard fully in, making them all equally distracted. I'm way, way more concerned about whether every player gets equally close to the bench before their replacement jumps on the ice in a line change. All these things have more impact on the outcomes of games than the inches that linesmen miss. And for that matter, I don't care that much whether offside is dropped altogether as a rule next year. The fact that we overrule goals that owe 0.0005 of their outcome to the accident of a missed offside makes me sick and despair at the competitive legitimacy of the game. The exact opposite of how you interpret that rule.
The game is called put the puck in the net. The only thing acceptable to measure in inches is whether the puck was in the net. It's not called touch the line with your skate. Every time a goal gets called back because a skate missed the line, the game is deligitimized, whether the call is technically correct or not. It's, as a category error, always "getting it wrong."