Aside from finishing first or last, what does it mean for a team to be promoted or relegated after last week's tournaments?
In International Hockey, ran by a non profit IIHF, all countrys have the same conditions.
If Cuba would sign on they would have to pay a fee and then just show up for a tournament. Though since there are so many teams, and the competition differs so much, you go through a pool system.
Cuba would start at the lowest level, the D-pool the last time I heard, and work their way up. If they win the D-pool they would then move up to the the C-pool.
If Canada and Qubeck split one of them would probably start in the D-pool, like when the Czech and the Slovakians split up, or Soviet and Latvia.
Here in Europe all leagues are non profitable, and actually owned by the fans.
The highest league in Sweden are the Swedish Elite League, which is basically run by all the 100's of teams in Sweden, and all the teams are owned by the fans.
In the SEL the same system applys, you win it one year, but if you finnish last the year after you will be relegated/demoted to the 2nd tier league.
This makes regular season extremely competetive at times, there are quit allot of money at the highest level, and practically none at the 2nd highest level. This have some interest on a place like this, were we discuss prospects, its impossible to "rebuild" for a team in Europe, and its so much easier for a coach often to bring in a vet then to play a kid.
Imagine the pressure on a coach in Toronto for example if the Maple Leafs would be sent to the AHL if they had a terrble year...