I do not understand this rule.
Last edited:
One of the worst calls I've seen this season so far, plus it negated a beautiful goal. So a goalie can just skate outside the crease and collide with someone and it's goalie interference?
My thoughts tooOutside the crease = both feet inside the blue paint? I think you might need to get a new pair of glasses because the ones you have are not working.
Then look at the goal last year where it was the exact same thing and called a goal against the Rangers. The NHLs response was Rantta’s head was outside the crease.Outside the crease = both feet inside the blue paint? I think you might need to get a new pair of glasses because the ones you have are not working.
I do not understand this rule.
please show us the goal that you are talking about.Then look at the goal last year where it was the exact same thing and called a goal against the Rangers. The NHLs response was Rantta’s head was outside the crease.
Coach's Challenge: NYR @ CAR - 9:04 of Third Periodplease show us the goal that you are talking about.
the burden of proof is on you.
When we made the call, initially the referee that hadn’t made the initial call came to us and said ‘The reason he’s saying it’s a good goal is because Antti was out of the blue,’ which I’m looking at and his two feet are in the blue paint, and there’s contact that lifts his mask, and obviously he can’t see the shot. And then they told us that Antti’s feet were in the blue, but his head was outside the blue paint, so it was involuntary contact because Antti’s face was out of the blue.
One of the worst calls I've seen this season so far, plus it negated a beautiful goal. So a goalie can just skate outside the crease and collide with someone and it's goalie interference?