Yeah, he is also a great puck mover. What I meant is he would probably have a Tanev type of career (Not necessarily at the same level), as a great defensive defensemen, who has great skating, with great puck moving ability, but lack some strength and not too much offensive game.
I mean, if his offensive game develop to the NHL, that is even better. But a guy like Vlasic was PPG at 18 years old in the Q, and only has one 30+ points season. He is still a great dmen known for his defensive play.
Yeah, fair enough. That's certainly a reasonable take. Projecting how offensive production in defencemen will translate can be a bit of a crapshoot.
Though i believe Vlasic's PPG season was his draft+1 was it not? And on a team with some crazy productive forwards as well. As opposed to less than half a ppg in his draft year? That makes a difference for me. Carrier is such a big part of the production on that Gatineau team as well this year (3rd on the entire team in scoring?), it's really impressive to me. The numbers compare pretty favourably to a guy like Letang even, at the same stage, and i can absolutely see a lot of it translating. Though probably not to that same level.
Ultimately, i think just his "quarterbacking" ability on the PP alone sets him a bit apart from a guy like Tanev in terms of projection. He's a guy that a drafting team is going to eventually hope to have manning a powerplay unit for them at least, which in itself, i'd expect to lead to some more offensive results. He also just
looks far more comfortable and in charge with the puck on his stick in the offensive zone to me.
Either way though, even if the offensive production doesn't fully translate at the next level, you're absolutely right, in that i think you've still got a solid all-around defenceman prospect. He's not strictly a "small offensive defenceman" type. He's a go-to guy in defensive situations, penalty kill, defending leads, etc. with Gatineau, and for good reason.