I presume Daniels is part of the coaching staff extensions.
It's now up to management to try to address the PP on ice.
It's now up to management to try to address the PP on ice.
Weeksie saying it's official.
I agree. So happy Rod is back I am choosing to celebrate. But lettuce pray for some adjustments because I have no idea where they’ll come from at this point.Not thrilled about the “staff” getting extended. Would’ve definitely liked some change on the assistant side of things because at some point the special teams failures have to stop falling on the players.
A PP with Aho, Guentzel, Jarvis, Svech and Burns should not be incompetent.
For the 1 millionth time, he doest even run the f***ing powerplay.Powerplay performance in each series loss with this staff (shorthanded goals against not included)
But sure, let's bring back Daniels. I'm sure scoring 2 goals maximum on the PP over a 7-game series will work out for us the next time around.
- vs Boston 2018-19 they were 1/14
- vs Boston 2019-20 they were 2/15
- vs Tampa 2020-21 they were 2/14
- vs Rangers 2021-22 they were 2/18
- vs Panthers 2022-23 they were 2/14
- vs Rangers 2023-24 they were 2/21
For the 1 millionth time, he doest even run the f***ing powerplay.
How about the players fall on the sword? Do you think the coaching staff told them to stand still and not move around at all? Do you think they coached them to lose damn near every face off so thet arent even staring the powerplay until 1:40 left? Did they coach Svech to trip the guy off the draw?Literally every time I've asked, no one has a clue who runs the PP. I've heard Daniels, I've heard Brindamour, I've heard both.
But considering we're obviously not letting Brindamour go, that leaves one person who should be falling on the sword for those PP results
I will do it. I will coach the PP.
Honestly, I'm still of the opinion that we should take a penalty immediately off the draw to start every PP. We had players that performed better with more open ice to work with, and obviously 5-on-4 wasn't much of an advantage for us, so going 4-on-4 from there couldn't hurt
Here's what I would do. If they fail to score on the first PP, decline the next or bribe the refs to award a penalty shot instead. This will save us all the aggravation and prevent unnecessary short-handed goals.
Personally I think it's so genius, it will eventually become a trend in the league.
Life is full of disappointmentI'm honestly going to be pretty disappointed if we come back with the exact same staff after showing once again we don't know how to change things that aren't working.
Honestly, I'm still of the opinion that we should take a penalty immediately off the draw to start every PP. We had players that performed better with more open ice to work with, and obviously 5-on-4 wasn't much of an advantage for us, so going 4-on-4 from there couldn't hurt
RBA’s requirements:
1) Martinook on the first line
2) J staal second line
3) andersen lose every game
Glad we have this moron locked up.
Man, I actually think goalie coaching was a very bright spot for us this year. The way we rebounded after Raanta collapsed and Freddie went out and we needed to dumpster dive for Martin speaks to very good coaching.Wonderful so goalie coach included in that huh?