Rank the Pacific Teams by prospect pool #1

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Hey everyone, I wanted to do a prospect pool ranking for the Pacific Division and want the output of all fanbases. Will keep this on for 24 hours (So it'll end at 7:45PM PST on June 30th).

Click to read more...

 

[KingsOfCali25]

It's the Ducks 1st now. LA had killed their pool already

 

[Sol]

Kings don’t have a prospect pool lol

 

[AbsentMojo]

Kings don’t have a prospect pool lol

Ya its prospect puddle

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Kings don’t have a prospect pool lol

Thanks Obama, I mean Rob Blake right?

 

[Bandit]

Kings are 9th in the Pacific.

 

[kovacro]

Blake pissed in the Kings prospect pool.

 

[BigBrown]

The only good prospect the Kings have is Clarke, without him I think the Kings are probably at or near the bottom of the league in prospects.

 

[Cook24]

When did we trade our prospect pool? We traded Faber and Grans… and some picks. But we really haven’t traded very many prospects…

 

[BigBrown]

When did we trade our prospect pool? We traded Faber and Grans… and some picks. But we really haven’t traded very many prospects…

It's not so much the trades, a lot of the prospects are still with the organization... But the good ones have already graduated and the rest haven't lived up to their promise or potential. At least it looks that way to me.

 

[kovacro]

The prospect pool has certainly shrunk..

 

[KingsHockey24]

Our prospect pool consists of Turcotte's medicine cabinet, Akil Thomas's clothing brand, Jeff Schultz 2.0, anddd some kid who just graduated High School as our goalie.

 

[bland]

Well, when you have had this much success, its only logical to have a shrinking prospect pool.

 

[Schrute farms]

When did we trade our prospect pool? We traded Faber and Grans… and some picks. But we really haven’t traded very many prospects…

The problem is we haven't added anything good the last two years/drafts. We're adding JAGs or bottom line / roll players at best. Two drafts and nothing to show for it high-end prospect wise. It's a big problem that will manifest in a couple years down the road. That can't be sustained.

 

[Raccoon Jesus]

Would prob be good to list each team's top-10 by some criteria after this draft, @Bjornar Moxnes . I don't expect everyone but the biggest prospect junkies to be up to date.

 

[King'sPawn]

When did we trade our prospect pool? We traded Faber and Grans… and some picks. But we really haven’t traded very many prospects…

It always depends on how people define prospects, but I think at this point it's fair to say Byfield and Kaliyev have graduated. No first round pick in 2 years, 12 picks total in that time. No trades for anyone under 22 in that span.

I've not sit down in a while to make my own list, but I think these are our top 10 prospects off the top of my head:
- Clarke
- Spence
- Laferriere
- Portillo
- Ziemmer
- Dvorak
- Fagemo
- Pinelli
- Chromiak
- Turcotte

 

[Schrute farms]

Not that i know anything, but i'd put Pinelli at #3 or 4. Maybe it's the Italian in me (that's what she said)

 

[Lt Dan]

42, It is the answer to everything

Maybe it's the Italian in me

 

[kings11]

It always depends on how people define prospects, but I think at this point it's fair to say Byfield and Kaliyev have graduated. No first round pick in 2 years, 12 picks total in that time. No trades for anyone under 22 in that span.

I've not sit down in a while to make my own list, but I think these are our top 10 prospects off the top of my head:
- Clarke
- Spence
- Laferriere
- Portillo
- Ziemmer
- Dvorak
- Fagemo
- Pinelli
- Chromiak
- Turcotte

While he’s a few years away from coming over Kirill Kirsanov is a damn good defensive project who some scouts have said has Dmitry Orlov attributes… Heck, I’ll settle for a LH Slava Voynov without the drama

 

[Schrute farms]

i seriously forgot about the Russian KK. That would be a good jolt to the team if he came over in two years as a replacement for Gavi when his deal ends.

 

[YP44]

ducks, sharks, top two in pacific than a bunch of meh.

 

[Kingfan1967]

1) Ducks (been building a pool for a few years)
2) Sharks (little behind Ana in building)
DROP
3) Kraken (too new to have build a good pool)
4) Kings (pool hasn't developed as hoped)
5) Canucks (same as LA and was behind LA to begin with)
HUGH DROP
6) Flames (your allowed to have prospects? why didn't anyone tell us)
7) Oilers(prospects? we don't need no stinking prospects)
8) Knights (in Vegas we call prospects Casino Chips and spend them like sailors on shore leave) (sure our AHL went to the Finals , but the team's avg age was 46)

 

[YP44]

1) Ducks (been building a pool for a few years)
2) Sharks (little behind Ana in building)
DROP
3) Kraken (too new to have build a good pool)
4) Kings (pool hasn't developed as hoped)
5) Canucks (same as LA and was behind LA to begin with)
HUGH DROP
6) Flames (your allowed to have prospects? why didn't anyone tell us)
7) Oilers(prospects? we don't need no stinking prospects)

8) knights (deal everyone)

 

[kingsfan28]

Hey everyone, I wanted to do a prospect pool ranking for the Pacific Division and want the output of all fanbases. Will keep this on for 24 hours (So it'll end at 7:45PM PST on June 30th).

How do you define prospects? Are they currently playing in the NHL or in the minors or junior level . Are the ranked by draft position , like 4 top 5 picks and playing well in other leagues .

 

[YP44]

How do you define prospects? Are they currently playing in the NHL or in the minors or junior level . Are the ranked by draft position , like 4 top 5 picks and playing well in other leagues .

vote on how you define? Either way I think it is Anaheim on top