Vegas got typical expansion rules
People keep saying this, but that's not true.
1998 Nashville: Teams could protect 1 G, 5 D, and 9 F, or 2 G 3 D 7 F. So they were picking the 16th or 13th best eligible player.
1999 Atlanta: Same as above, but considering that each teams 16th or 13th player were taken the previous year.
2000 CBJ & Minn: Same as above, but two teams selecting from teams already been depleted the two previous years and were alternating picks.
2017 Vegas: Teams could protect 1 G 3D and 7 F, or 1 G and 8 skaters of any position.
Teams were able to protect 4 fewer players for the Vegas draft. If teams were able to protect the same amount of players how many of the current Knights would still be left unprotected? None of those trades would have happened. And even then its a far better situation than CBJ and Minn came into the league with sharing an expansion draft after 2 years of expansion drafts.
<As a preemptive response to the inevitable "you're just whining" responses- I'm not. I thought Vegas would suck this year too. I've just heard way too many people falsely claim that they had the same rules and options available to them as other expansion teams>