[Randall] How the Golden Knights went from risky ploy to model franchise.

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,634
4,156
Because your team never built a winner and is out of the playoffs and it hurts.
Because teams should succeed through the entry draft and free agency....

If you want proof that Vegas's expansion draft was idiot proofed by the league, George McPhee was able to assemble a team that has made it to the Conference Finals.
 

Joe MacMillan

Registered User
Aug 10, 2005
4,882
102
Helsinki
Because teams should succeed through the entry draft and free agency....

If you want proof that Vegas's expansion draft was idiot proofed by the league, George McPhee was able to assemble a team that has made it to the Conference Finals.
Partly because they were able to convert a player whose career-high was 9 goals to a 43 goal scorer. But I guess that was the league's doing as well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbwingsfan

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,634
4,156
Partly because they were able to convert a player whose career-high was 9 goals to a 43 goal scorer. But I guess that was the league's doing as well?
No, I have no issue admitting that players like Karlsson surprised everyone including McPhee but that doesn't change the fact that they were gifted the most favorable expansion draft scenario in league history.

As the CBJ GM said, we know we are going to lose a good player the issue is which one.

In the past, teams didn't have to worry about losing any good players at all. It should have been kept that way and Vegas should have used the entry draft and cap space to acquire its key talents.

I also don't have anything against the Knights. They just did what any team would do in their situation. The problem is the other 30 owners who didn't drive harder bargains when negotiating expansion. They could have kept all their good players AND gotten the same amount of money from Vegas but they didn't.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,123
14,864
I knew they would be not the worst team in the league before the season even started. Took me about a 20 games in and I realized the league made a huge mistake. Then I realized that it probably wasn't a mistake and they knew they had to farm some fans while they are still the only professional team in Vegas. The problem I think I see is that they are going to lose alot of long time fans when they beat the Jets. I had predicted them to go to the SCF months ago if you want to go through my post history and find that I'm not flip flopping. Just watching them I knew they were a top team in the west.

Going by this teams 2016/17 seasons (totals in brackets)

Marchessault (51)- Karlsson (25) - Smith (37)
Perron (46) - Haula (26) - Neal (42)
Leipsic (AHL) - Eakin (12) - Tuch (NCAA)
Nosek (AHL) - Bellemare (8) - Lindberg (20)

Schmidt (17) - McNabb (4/healthy scratch)
Miller (16) - Theodore (9/AHL)
Engelland (16) - Garrison (12)

Fleury (backup goalie)
Pickard (backup goalie)

I will never believe one single person who can look at that roster and believe that the NHL gave them an unfair advantage and thought they would be good.

Hell, if Florida had any common sense then you can also remove Marchessault/Smith from that list and add Petrovic . It's not the NHL's fault that Florida had a stroke on expansion day.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,161
16,183
First off, it's called a comparison to demonstrate a point. I used a particularly heinous example to show why the league stepping in at all is not good.

Second, it's disingenuous to call the players Vegas selected "cast offs." By definition, any player Vegas selected would be a cast off even if teams could only protect 1 player. That doesn't mean they aren't valuable or that the team deemed them expendable. Now, plenty of teams have more than 11 valuable, key players.

Third, slightly deeper is an understatement. In previous expansion drafts, teams had to select a significant number of players who were on other teams' AHL squads.

You're really reaching.
 

Joe MacMillan

Registered User
Aug 10, 2005
4,882
102
Helsinki
No, I have no issue admitting that players like Karlsson surprised everyone including McPhee but that doesn't change the fact that they were gifted the most favorable expansion draft scenario in league history.

As the CBJ GM said, we know we are going to lose a good player the issue is which one.

In the past, teams didn't have to worry about losing any good players at all. It should have been kept that way and Vegas should have used the entry draft and cap space to acquire its key talents.
I don't think expansion draft rules 20 years ago should dictate how they should have handled the draft last July.

Fact of the matter is coming into the season no one thought Vegas could compete with the roster they picked at the draft. So I don't see what the issue is here.
 

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,634
4,156
Plenty of teams' 5th defenseman and 7th forward are "key" players?
Yes. Teams aren't as top heavy as they used to be. Now, rosters are built on depth - guys who a few years ago would have been top-6 forwards or top-4 defensemen but are lower because of age, experience, or chemistry.
 

GOilers88

Upside Down Canadian Flag
Dec 24, 2016
14,281
20,928
I've just come to terms that if they swept the entire playoffs and won a Stanley Cup this year people would still defend the expansion draft.

Absolutely unbelievable the mental gymnastics some of you people must go through to try to make this into some feel good story. They made the NHL look like a joke with their expansion draft conditions.
Yeah. Griffin Reinhart, Luca Sbisa, Derek Engelland, Marc Methot, Brayden McNabb and Colin Miller was probably the most unfair blueline I've ever seen. With those guys defending the zone and big gamers like Alex Tuch, Reilly Smith and Erik Haula patrolling the ice it's a wonder they didn't go 82-0.

Seriously, you just look like a whiner.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
The player you lost to them isn’t even on their team anymore and is a bottom pair dman...

Fans of, for example, Florida would make sense to hate vegas

Why would this even be a reason to hate a team? Most Flyers fans rallied behind the LA Kings in 2012 and 2014 because of Jeff Carter and Mike Richards. Vegas also has Ryan Carpenter who the Sharks put on waivers.

Ahh, but Vegas didn't run Florida out of the playoffs on rails.

This, along with the fact that they have the worst, most spoiled, entitled, and annoying fan base (speaking from experiences with in person fans)...not hard to hate.

For the record, I said Vegas was my least favorite team after the second time San Jose played them in the regular season. The plethora of dirty plays they commit with a suspicious lack of supplemental discipline is another reason to hate them.

Remember folks, this is not even a 2 minute minor penalty, in the regular season:



(Joel Ward was seriously injured on the play and needed shoulder surgery.)

But this is a 5 minute major and a game misconduct to go along with a one game suspension in the playoffs:

 

VoluntaryDom

Formerly DominicBoltsFan / Ⓐ / ✞
Oct 31, 2016
23,285
5,532
Tampa FL
Why would this even be a reason to hate a team? Most Flyers fans rallied behind the LA Kings in 2012 and 2014 because of Jeff Carter and Mike Richards. Vegas also has Ryan Carpenter who the Sharks put on waivers.



This, along with the fact that they have the worst, most spoiled, entitled, and annoying fan base (speaking from experiences with in person fans)...not hard to hate.

For the record, I said Vegas was my least favorite team after the second time San Jose played them in the regular season. The plethora of dirty plays they commit with a suspicious lack of supplemental discipline is another reason to hate them.

Remember folks, this is not even a 2 minute minor penalty, in the regular season:



(Joel Ward was seriously injured on the play and needed shoulder surgery.)

But this is a 5 minute major and a game misconduct to go along with a one game suspension in the playoffs:


Caps are the same way LOL, Kempny makes a massive cross check, only a fine, makes another this game, and probably isn’t getting supplemental discipline for it
 

IceNeophyte

Registered User
Nov 14, 2017
9,990
7,304
Why would this even be a reason to hate a team? Most Flyers fans rallied behind the LA Kings in 2012 and 2014 because of Jeff Carter and Mike Richards. Vegas also has Ryan Carpenter who the Sharks put on waivers.



This, along with the fact that they have the worst, most spoiled, entitled, and annoying fan base (speaking from experiences with in person fans)...not hard to hate.

For the record, I said Vegas was my least favorite team after the second time San Jose played them in the regular season. The plethora of dirty plays they commit with a suspicious lack of supplemental discipline is another reason to hate them.

Remember folks, this is not even a 2 minute minor penalty, in the regular season:



(Joel Ward was seriously injured on the play and needed shoulder surgery.)

But this is a 5 minute major and a game misconduct to go along with a one game suspension in the playoffs:



Schmidt is very clearly trying to let up here. It was an unfortunate chain of events and Kane wasn't hit with force. The thought of San Jose fans calling VGK dirty is rich. The exception being Reaves.

The funny thing is that I've found SJS fans around town and at the games to be likable. It's the keyboard warriors on social media that I find obnoxious.
 

TomasHertlsRooster

Don’t say eye test when you mean points
May 14, 2012
33,360
25,417
Fremont, CA
Schmidt is very clearly trying to let up here. It was an unfortunate chain of events and Kane wasn't hit with force. The thought of San Jose fans calling VGK dirty is rich. The exception being Reaves.

The funny thing is that I've found SJS fans around town and at the games to be likable. It's the keyboard warriors on social media that I find obnoxious.

The funny thing is that I am basing my fan base comments entirely on my experience at T-Mobile Arena. And it’s the fact that they were the stereotypical, aggressive drunk people in Vegas trying to start fights; not that I overheard some of them trying to figure out how many games were in a playoff series.
 

IceNeophyte

Registered User
Nov 14, 2017
9,990
7,304
The funny thing is that I am basing my fan base comments entirely on my experience at T-Mobile Arena. And it’s the fact that they were the stereotypical, aggressive drunk people in Vegas trying to start fights; not that I overheard some of them trying to figure out how many games were in a playoff series.
Odd, I've been to 30 games and I've seen two instances of idiocy.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,161
16,183
Yes. Teams aren't as top heavy as they used to be. Now, rosters are built on depth - guys who a few years ago would have been top-6 forwards or top-4 defensemen but are lower because of age, experience, or chemistry.

Sure, every player contributes and helps the team win, but look down the expansion draft list, are you going to say each team lost a key player they really couldn't afford to lose?
 

CantHaveTkachev

Legends
Nov 30, 2004
49,697
29,508
St. OILbert, AB
people blaming the NHL because other GMs were dumb enough to expose good players is hilarious

the salary cap plays a huge role in this as well...Fleury, Reilly Smith, and Neal were exposed due to cap reasons
 

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,634
4,156
Sure, every player contributes and helps the team win, but look down the expansion draft list, are you going to say each team lost a key player they really couldn't afford to lose?
No, nobody lost anybody they couldn't afford to lose. But that's not what I'm arguing. What I'm saying is they all had the potential to lose a player who was pretty good.

Being able to field a team of "pretty good" players with the existence of a salary cap and being able to start from scratch is a recipe for a good amount of success in the first season. And that's more of an advantage than any other expansion team has gotten.

I'm just saying, let the expansion draft be a way for the team to field a roster of warm bodies who are simply placeholders for when the actually good players come through the draft and free agency. That's been the philosophy for every expansion draft until now.
 

Newsworthy

Registered User
Jan 28, 2018
4,253
982
USA
Sure, every player contributes and helps the team win, but look down the expansion draft list, are you going to say each team lost a key player they really couldn't afford to lose?
Your not factoring in teams having to surrender draft picks.
 

Kranix

Deranged Homer
Jun 27, 2012
18,161
16,183
No, nobody lost anybody they couldn't afford to lose. But that's not what I'm arguing. What I'm saying is they all had the potential to lose a player who was pretty good.

Being able to field a team of "pretty good" players with the existence of a salary cap and being able to start from scratch is a recipe for a good amount of success in the first season. And that's more of an advantage than any other expansion team has gotten.

I'm just saying, let the expansion draft be a way for the team to field a roster of warm bodies who are simply placeholders for when the actually good players come through the draft and free agency. That's been the philosophy for every expansion draft until now.

But why? Why do it the same way? Like you said teams are deep, the league realized the old way was bad, and new teams could afford lose some players that were better than AHL level.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->