I agree that he has the skill but on the flip side scoring in the OHL is not a forsure thing. There has been guys who scored big and haven't done anything in the NHL.
Oh, for sure. But let's take a look at leage leaders from the past decade in the OHL:
Perry: 130 pts, 60 GP (2.166 PPG)
Locke: 118 points, 68 GP (1.735 PPG)
Locke: 151 points, 66 GP (2.287 PPG)
Robinson: 110 points, 67 GP (1.64 PPG)
Wellwood: 118 points, 68 GP (1.735 PPG)
Spezza: 60 points, 26 GP (2.307 PPG)
Keefe: 121 points, 66 GP (1.83 PPG)
Sarno: 130 points, 68 GP (1.911 PPG)
Sarno: 121 points, 64 GP (1.89 PPG)
Savard: 130 points, 64 GP (2.03 PPG)
Brand: 119 points, 66 GP (1.80 PPG)
Savard: 139 points, 66 GP (2.106 PPG)
I threw Spezza's in there because I remembered his spectacular junior career; there are probably other examples like that.
Nevertheless, only Locke, Perry, and Savard (twice) led the OHL in scoring by averaging over 2 PPG in the past ten years.
Schremp, as everyone knows, is currently scoring at a 3.2 PPG pace. The wide-open game is a huge factor here, of course. But even if you were to dock him a point per game to compensate, he'd still finish the year with a rate close to that of Locke and Spezza's. Locke is a special case; the guy has everything but speed, height and size. Schremp bests him in all three catagories, so it's only logical that he will most likely best him in NHL career.
That leaves Spezza. Is Schremp Spezza-good? Not many players on the planet are, and #44 isn't one of them. But the odds of him succeeding are extremely good when the player he will probably out-produce at the junior level is an NHL all-star and potential Art Ross winner.