garbageteam
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2010
- 1,411
- 659
I hope he turns out to be a player for us as well. At the moment though if I could go back and redo that pick I would.
Everyone would, but he's definitely not a write-off yet.
I hope he turns out to be a player for us as well. At the moment though if I could go back and redo that pick I would.
Edler Hughes
Hutton Stecher
Juolevi Tanev
Edler - Stecher
Hughes - Tanev
Hutton - Guddy
Biega
...
Next year
Edler - Karlsson
Hughes - Petriangelo
Stecher - Tanev
Hutton
This would never be a good defense. By the time Juolevi is NHL ready, and Hughes is ready for the top pairing (which may never even happen), Edler will be old as f***.Edler Hughes
Hutton Stecher
Juolevi Tanev
lol good luck with thatEdler - Stecher
Hughes - Tanev
Hutton - Guddy
Biega
...
Next year
Edler - Karlsson
Hughes - Petriangelo
Stecher - Tanev
Hutton
lol good luck with that
God if Quinn can push Gubranson out of the damn lineup it can't be too soon.
Does Gudranson keep you up at night?God if Quinn can push Gubranson out of the damn lineup it can't be too soon.
Welcome to the Quinn Hughes era
Welcome to the Quinn Hughes era
Another example of this management group (pair?) having no patience and no foresight.
Great plan. Let's both burn a year off his ELC and be forced to use a protection slot in the expansion draft, all so that Aquilini can keep his hopes alive for two whole games of playoff revenue. With only a few months of patience we could get a whole extra year of play from this player on the cheap. Now we'll need to re-sign Hughes and Pettersson during the same off-season, and none of the contracts that comprise Benning's ingenious $12 million 4th line will have expired by then. Future looking bright. We'll be in cap hell and still paying Eriksson and Gudbranson $10 million for their "contributions."
You can't win in the NHL without effective young players contributing on their ELC. Oh right, this team isn't about winning, it's about selling hotdogs and $10 beers for two games of a first round sweep.
Quinn wants to turn pro and be in the NHL. Why would we deny his request?
The same reason you might not want to eat ice-cream for dinner and ice-cream for dessert. Just because he wants something, or you want something, doesn't mean it's a good idea, or that it makes sense for the team at this very second. Boeser might want a $20 million contract. Who are we to deny him? It's called "management." I can understand why you might not be familiar with the concept given the team you follow.
Another example of this management group (pair?) having no patience and no foresight.
Great plan. Let's both burn a year off his ELC and be forced to use a protection slot in the expansion draft, all so that Aquilini can keep his hopes alive for two whole games of playoff revenue. With only a few months of patience we could get a whole extra year of play from this player on the cheap. Now we'll need to re-sign Hughes and Pettersson during the same off-season, and none of the contracts that comprise Benning's ingenious $12 million 4th line will have expired by then. Future looking bright. We'll be in cap hell and still paying Eriksson and Gudbranson $10 million for their "contributions."
You can't win in the NHL without effective young players contributing on their ELC. Oh right, this team isn't about winning, it's about selling hotdogs and $10 beers for two games of a first round sweep.
lmao, thats obviously not the same. Its very common practice to sign college players when their seasons are over to give them an early look in the NHL. He could also join Utica for a playoff run as well.
The irony in this post is next level. Hint: foresightAnother example of this management group (pair?) having no patience and no foresight.
Great plan. Let's both burn a year off his ELC and be forced to use a protection slot in the expansion draft, all so that Aquilini can keep his hopes alive for two whole games of playoff revenue. With only a few months of patience we could get a whole extra year of play from this player on the cheap. Now we'll need to re-sign Hughes and Pettersson during the same off-season, and none of the contracts that comprise Benning's ingenious $12 million 4th line will have expired by then. Future looking bright. We'll be in cap hell and still paying Eriksson and Gudbranson $10 million for their "contributions."
You can't win in the NHL without effective young players contributing on their ELC. Oh right, this team isn't about winning, it's about selling hotdogs and $10 beers for two games of a first round sweep.
I am selfish as well as I want to watch him play as soon as possible. I think it likely helps his development as well. Gives him incentive for the summer ensures that he signs with us and likely is better for relationship. Maybe hold him out a couple games to protect for expansion draft, but holding him out when he is good enough to play would be bush league.
No, bush league is mismanaging your assets to such a degree that you can't afford to sign your good young players in the 2021 off-season because you've committed too much cap-space to 4th liners and decided to burn a bunch of ELC years off your young prospects. Considering this GM just mismanaged himself into being forced to play a teenage goalie from the OHL with not a single professional game of experience, with no goalie on the bench to back him up, I have absolutely no faith that they're actually *planning* for anything. Planning is clearly not an area of strength.
Bush league is having no good young players contributing on ELCs because you had no patience. Bush league is being fined for tampering because you can't keep your mouth shut about PK Subban in a TV interview. Bush league is offer-sheeting Ryan O'Reily to a 2-year, $10 million contract and not being aware that he would have to clear waivers first (enjoying the Weisbrod era?). Detail-oriented, careful planning is the exact opposite of Bush League. On the contrary, it's how championship teams are built.
Benning is trying to save his job and doesn't care about the future. He knows he'll be gone before he can reap the rewards if he doesn't burn that ELC year now. If you can't see that then you're blind. He's hoping Hughes can pull a rabbit out of his hat and distract everyone from the horrible D-core he's constructed. His head is on the chopping block, and every managerial embarrassment brings the axe closer.
Does Gudranson keep you up at night?