Melvin
21/12/05
Having an opinion you don't like is not bias.
I like this player quite a bit. He’s an outstanding prospect. I’ve repeatedly compared him to Barrie and Krug who are excellent NHL players.
I just think the complete and total non-concern about his size is insanity, and there will be a much longer adjustment period than everyone here who is expecting another Pettersson/Boeser situation is prepared for.
And having questions about a player and staying consistent about those questions since before we drafted him is not ‘bias’. It’s an opinion.
I don’t disagree with any of that and it mirrors my thoughts pretty well. I think your position tends to be a bit inconsistent at times though and I find it hard to tell what you truly believe.
How have I been inconsistent?
A player that’s getting “ventilated” at the NCAA level, who didn’t attend the combine because he was scared everyone would find out he was 5’8”, and who struggled to score against his peer group at the WJC (which is a silly criticism in itself) isn’t consistent with an outstanding prospect IMO.
He’s the best skating prospect on the planet and as good a prospect as you’ll ever see at getting the puck from his own zone to the opposition blueline.
He’s also tremendously one-dimensional at this point and incredibly tiny for his position. Has no shot and will struggle badly defensively initially.
I suspect that (like Barrie/Krug) he will plateau as a 2nd pairing guy who needs to be sheltered a bit at ES and will pile up points on the PP.
I don’t think the 5’8. I do think he’s 5’9.
Do you think that, like Barrie/Krug he probably won't play until he's 21-22?
They’re gonna play him no matter what. My gut feel is that a year in the AHL might be best but that’s a moot point.
You’ll probably see something a bit like Sergachev’s year last year with low ES minutes, 80% o-zone starts, and hope he gets 20 points on the PP and doesn’t bleed too many goals.
I love how any disagreement turns into a pleb calling someone a "Benningster", for what it's worth, I do hope he is relieved from the Canucks. Just because I don't spend majority of my time complaining on a Internet forum about Canucks doesn't mean I don't see the issues with the team.
Damn! If only he was an inch bigger!
All you have to do is zoom the picture and scroll to the btm of your screen to create a horizontal line that puts Perunavich in the exact height as Hughes.
Anyways i could care less about an inch even though my wife might get more worked up about it. Bottom line is can he be effective enough to play 5v5 for 20 minutes a night.......we"ll see.
I will say this...i agree with MS somewhat, I went to most of his games here live (U20s) and i know it was just a small sample but if he plays like he did he's gonna be a turnover machine with containment issues. Like most players out of junior or College he needs to be going 100% every shift and he cant keep reversing the flow of the game as the last man back and casualy turn on his skating and expect to not get stripped by NHLers
Much like Pettersson, Hughes is a supremely intelligent player. This is such an important trait in terms of his adjustment to the NHL and I’m so happy we finally have a GM capable of connecting with these high IQ athletes. Hughes is a player that will look even better playing with actual NHL-level talent. Our PP is going to be formidable in the coming years as he fills its biggest need. His defensive skill is actually underrated, and like Stecher, he’ll learn tricks to defending larger players. Player is simply too much of a phenom to fail, and his skills are designed for an evolving game. To call him one-dimensional is laughable. Player can pass and skate at an elite level, and has a bit of a chippy streak to boot. Heck he might even help it evolve himself in his prime.
Don’t let these Dobson>Hughes opinions delude you; there will be bumps in the road, but Hughes’ impact on this team will be almost instantaneously positive.
Much like Pettersson, Hughes is a supremely intelligent player. This is such an important trait in terms of his adjustment to the NHL and I’m so happy we finally have a GM capable of connecting with these high IQ athletes. Hughes is a player that will look even better playing with actual NHL-level talent. Our PP is going to be formidable in the coming years as he fills its biggest need. His defensive skill is actually underrated, and like Stecher, he’ll learn tricks to defending larger players. Player is simply too much of a phenom to fail, and his skills are designed for an evolving game. To call him one-dimensional is laughable. Player can pass and skate at an elite level, and has a bit of a chippy streak to boot. Heck he might even help it evolve himself in his prime.
Don’t let these Dobson>Hughes opinions delude you; there will be bumps in the road, but Hughes’ impact on this team will be almost instantaneously positive.
My biggest fears are that Green will have him on a leash and limit his creative potential. As a rookie, Green might also give him a 6th d minutes probably under 14 minutes a game and not give him enough opportunities to succeed.
Why aren't you questioning where those other sources are pulling their data? Why are they assumed to be more official when you don't know?
EliteProspects.com said:For example when it comes to player stats, we have deals/agreements with most major leagues where we get their stats via a feed on daily basis. Other, more obscures leagues, we have volunteers taking care of the updates manually.
HockeyDB.com said:Due to this, all statistics submissions to hockeydb.com must be provided in writing, with official documented proof of the numbers. The only documentation that is acceptable is a photocopy of a team or league publication, or a newspaper article that provides direct proof of the claim.