question to european hockey fans

[sheep]

What do you think of hockey played on the smaller ice surface? Faster , Slower, more scoring chances,more hitting?Moree flow to the game more penalties?Ect.

Click to read more...

 

[SChan*]

What do you think of hockey played on the smaller ice surface? Faster , Slower, more scoring chances,more hitting?Moree flow to the game more penalties?Ect.

More clutching and grabbing, less scoring chances. I prefer olympic size of the rinks. And it's evident it's more entertaining to watch. because it was amazing hockey at olympics 2002.

NHL should make the rinks larger.

 

[Riddarn]

What do you think of hockey played on the smaller ice surface? Faster , Slower, more scoring chances,more hitting?Moree flow to the game more penalties?Ect.

Faster, better flow. Less technical play and a bit too few creative options. I love up&down action but I do also like dekes and creative passing. I'd like to see european rinks smaller and NHL rinks larger. The finnish rinks are just in the middle in size which I think is a great way to go, especially if both IIHF and the NHL should move the nets back 3 feet closer to the boards.

 

[wilka91*]

More clutching and grabbing, less scoring chances. I prefer olympic size of the rinks. And it's evident it's more entertaining to watch. because it was amazing hockey at olympics 2002.

NHL should make the rinks larger.

I agree 100%

The 2002 Olympics are an example to follow.

NHL hockey sucks.

 

[e-e]

More clutching and grabbing, less scoring chances. I prefer olympic size of the rinks. And it's evident it's more entertaining to watch. because it was amazing hockey at olympics 2002.

NHL should make the rinks larger.