Luigi Lemieux
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2003
- 21,568
- 9,438
Yeah right now there's no doubt the pens are rocking two 4th lines. Neal and Bennett make that problem go away though.
I think the point is, most team's bottom two lines would look pretty bad if they had three injuries to their forward group.
In sum:
"Extra! Extra! The Pens have a bunch of injuries and the injury replacements aren't as good!"
I just wanted to see Iced's head explode.
I think the bigger problem is that the third and fourth lines don't have anything in the way of play drivers, so even when everybody's healthy it's never going to be all that great of a group. This is where the losses of Staal, and to an extent Kennedy hurt this team. Sutter just isn't anywhere near the same center as Jordan and it's questionable whether he can anchor a very good third line even with above average linemates.
The article is of course flawed although the author admits as much, but I do think there is plenty to be concerned about. D'Agostini is a couple years removed from his only productive season and really can't be counted on to be an effective player for us. Bennett has shown a lot of promise but is still more or less a rookie with a lot to learn, and maybe isn't all that well suited for a checking line (time will tell). Sutter has been fairly average as a third line center and despite his age has shown very little in the way of improvement. Chances are our top 6 will need to carry us to have success, and even though that's a given with this team to some, it wasn't like that in the past. Whether or not Sid and Geno had big games, we could count on Staal, TK, and Cooke to chip in with a few goals and play a solid shutdown game against the opposing team's best players where they'd usually carry the play. It doesn't matter if we ice a perfectly healthy team now because we no longer have that luxury.
Also disagree heavily with Jaded on the value of third lines. They can have a large impact on games and tilt a series in your favor. It's no coincidence that all of the recent cup winners, and even the teams that lost in the finals all had very good depth in their top 9.
Bennett can drive the play on the third line. Or even better yet, Dupuis.
Where we differ is that I think we have the personnel to have a successful and productive 3rd line with Bennett/Sutter/Kobasew/D'Agostini.
Like Ogre said, Bennett can be a play driver. He's already pretty much established that he's the most creative forward on the team outside of Sid and Geno, and if Staal were on the team, the same would probably still be true.
What is the deal with D'Agostini? What is wrong with him? I'm really interested to see what he can do.
I don't think he was injured that bad. He was probably banged up, Pens were at the roster and cap limit and didn't want to lose him so they put him on LTIR. Just speculating of course.
I think the bigger problem is that the third and fourth lines don't have anything in the way of play drivers, so even when everybody's healthy it's never going to be all that great of a group. This is where the losses of Staal, and to an extent Kennedy hurt this team. Sutter just isn't anywhere near the same center as Jordan and it's questionable whether he can anchor a very good third line even with above average linemates.
The article is of course flawed although the author admits as much, but I do think there is plenty to be concerned about. D'Agostini is a couple years removed from his only productive season and really can't be counted on to be an effective player for us. Bennett has shown a lot of promise but is still more or less a rookie with a lot to learn, and maybe isn't all that well suited for a checking line (time will tell). Sutter has been fairly average as a third line center and despite his age has shown very little in the way of improvement. Chances are our top 6 will need to carry us to have success, and even though that's a given with this team to some, it wasn't like that in the past. Whether or not Sid and Geno had big games, we could count on Staal, TK, and Cooke to chip in with a few goals and play a solid shutdown game against the opposing team's best players where they'd usually carry the play. It doesn't matter if we ice a perfectly healthy team now because we no longer have that luxury.
Also disagree heavily with Jaded on the value of third lines. They can have a large impact on games and tilt a series in your favor. It's no coincidence that all of the recent cup winners, and even the teams that lost in the finals all had very good depth in their top 9.
I never said that third and fourth lines are unimportant. Just like I never said that draft picks and prospects are unimportant.
What I ACTUALLY said on both topics is that people here have a distorted view of each. Just because your average draft pick has a fairly long shot to the NHL, does not mean that you do not need enough of those to beat that long shot to ice a competitive team. You definately have to. Similarly, your bottom six is important to winning. However, the difference between a great bottom six and an average one is not the chasm some make it out to be. All I am saying is that a bit of perspective is in order. And in a cap world you need to make some choices. In the end the choice between Crosby and Malkin between other top six players and Cooke and Jokinen for instance, well you be the judge which choice is the bigger gap of consequences.