I would like to address some of the comments. First, I agree that the conclusion of the article is a bit harsh. I do not see the Avs struggling to make the playoffs. I see them a solid 4-7 seed. I do not think they pull off Central champs again, but I do not see any of last year's non-playoff teams beating the out.
Second, the bit about Varly being on the decline...if he does not finish top 2 in the Vezina voting, then yes, that IS a decline. Even if he gets 39 wins, a .925 save percentage, and a 2.45 GAA....that is a decline. I do not think the author is saying he will crash, but more that he will not be as spectacular as he was last year. But I do not agree, I think the improvements were indicative of real gains. He has always had the raw ability, and last year showed what can happen with good coaching.
Similar story with EJ. He is not an elite defender. He may have led the Avs in D scoring (by ONE point over Barrie, despite an extra 16 games), but he was not even top 25 in the NHL, whilst on the 4th highest scoring team. He would place a bit higher in the "two-way" defenseman list, but still not top 5 (Weber, Keith, Chara, Doughty, Suter, etc.). He is easily the Avs best all around D...that does not necessarily translate into being a league best. Top 10 maybe, top 20 for sure, but top 5? No. And top 5 is how I interpret "the league’s best blueliners."
As for the rest of the complaints about it...I am forced to agree. Some real research into the off-season moves might have been good. Not giving credence to random rumors as well.