Prospect Parallels

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Gwyddbwyll, May 6, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gwyddbwyll

    Gwyddbwyll Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    10,763
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Just a draft aficinado here, I havent seen many of these guys but starting to draw some parallels after keeping myself in touch with reports. Like many of us do I guess.

    Valabik = Babchuk
    (Babchuk was disregarded until the final months when he shot up everyone's lists almost to the top 5 but surprised everyone by dropping 20 spots)

    Sindel = Havlat/Hemsky
    (ultra skilled forward but scouts worried he wont be tough enough)

    Karsums = Kanko
    (energy player who plays his heart out)

    Rogers = Focht
    (big with a big shot, looked great in skills testing but not as great on the ice)

    Lyamin = Knyazev
    (no real weaknesses, solid player but no strengths either)

    Malkin = Svitov
    (strong skilled player, not really a power forward but a great package to be as good as he wants to be)

    Olesz = Michalek
    (ok a bit weaker comparision. Talented forward way ahead of his peers.. just seem to have the same two-way top class coachable talent.)

    Chipchura = poor mans Upshall
    (not as good but brings a ton of hockey to the table.)

    Am I way off on some of these? Please post some of your own parallels.

    (and yes I do know every player is their own individual and not exactly like another.. however its a natural inclination to classify prospects :))
     
  2. Brock

    Brock Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    10,995
    Likes Received:
    596
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    The GTA
    Home Page:
    For Valabik, I'd say he's closer to an Alexei Semenov type of player. Good both ways, good skater for his size, but also a physically punishing player. Babchuk has never really struck me as an extremely physical player, although I still like him.
     
  3. Doomsday Device

    Doomsday Device Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Gary Coleman's Finishing School for Doomsday Devic
    Home Page:
    While Valabik has certainly improved his stock as the year has gone on, Babchuk was always considered to be a high pick. He, Whitney, Pitkanen, and Bouwmeester were seemingly the Big 4 defenceman for most of the 2001-2002 hockey season. They were all big, good skaters, and considered surefire top 10 picks.
     
  4. Gwyddbwyll

    Gwyddbwyll Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    10,763
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Really? I dont remember it that way but I may be wrong. What about Eminger? I would have thought he would be a more likely member of the top 4 as you say.
     
  5. Lord

    Lord Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    sport reporter
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Home Page:
     
  6. Doomsday Device

    Doomsday Device Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    Gary Coleman's Finishing School for Doomsday Devic
    Home Page:
    I'm not sure how Eminger was perceived at the beginning of the year, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't as highly thought of as the four I mentioned and was considered a mid first-rounder. His stock improved as the year went on to being a borderline top ten pick.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"