Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
If Price is traded (big if), a lot of you are going to eat crow when you see the trade. Told you this on the Patch trade and I'm saying it with both Weber and Price.
Price is the worst contract in the NHL.
He is the most untradeable player in the league.
Habs fans better just hope he rights his ship, because you're never getting rid of him.
You can drop the $10M cap hit narrative cause everyone knows the Habs will retain to some degree if Price (big if) is traded. I have the retention at $2.5M bringing it down to $8M AAV. If you feel you can win with a $5M or $6M goalie, all the power to you.
Avs have more cap space than that from what I can see. But if they feel they only have $6M for their goalie, that is their prerogative.
Price is the worst contract in the NHL.
He is the most untradeable player in the league.
Habs fans better just hope he rights his ship, because you're never getting rid of him.
You're not looking beyond this season when analyzing the situation; that's a big problem. Obviously Price is still a good goalie, but it's pretty clear he's not the goalie he was a few years ago. It's not solely the MTL defense that's responsible for his regression; it's age. He's overpaid now and he's got SEVEN years left on his deal. It doesn't take a lot of critical thinking to see that's not a good situation going forward. Hence the reason pretty much all non-MTL fans in this thread want no part of Price even for free. There's nothing "impartial" about your view on this at all.
I’d probably do Martin Jones and Vlasic for Price if Vlasic and Jones would both waive.
2019 - Jordan Binnington - $650,000
2018 - Braden Holtby - $6,100,000
2017 - Marc-Andre Fleury - $5,750,000
2016 - Matt Murray - $550,000
2015 - Corey Crawford - $6,000,000
You're literally talking out of your ass.
Just because your GM foolishly committed double-digit AAV to your goalie - who happens to be good, and was once elite - doesn't mean that's the industry norm. And it certainly doesn't mean it's some sort of criterion for winning.
Price's contract isn't that bad. It might be one of the "scariest" contract i guess - but it's not that bad.
Asking whether Price is elite or not is still very much debateable. He had a great season last year - but has struggled with some consistency issues. It's different than guys like Lucic or Seabrook who clearly are "done" as top players but with bad contracts. Price may have a lot of years left as a top goalie. So it's a "scary" contract in the sense that if things go bad, it can be bad for a long time to get rid of $$.
But flipside is his level of play is still great - and put him for the first time in his career on an actual good team - and he might be crazy good. So it's a gamble.
I agree that it's a hard trade with any team - but his value is nowhere near as bad as many imply on HF.
Pesce +1st is crazy for Price.
wahhh, its a dumb narrative about goalie salaries, it doesnt mean anything and not relevant (despite history supporting your claim). but, but, but... its only X% of cap, nevermind no goalie over $6.1 ever wins cups in the last 15 years.2019 - Jordan Binnington - $650,000
2018 - Braden Holtby - $6,100,000
2017 - Marc-Andre Fleury - $5,750,000
2016 - Matt Murray - $550,000
2015 - Corey Crawford - $6,000,000
You're literally talking out of your ass.
Just because your GM foolishly committed double-digit AAV to your goalie - who happens to be good, and was once elite - doesn't mean that's the industry norm. And it certainly doesn't mean it's some sort of criterion for winning.
If the Habs retain down to $8M, it's no scarier than having Burns's contract.
2019 - Jordan Binnington - $650,000
2018 - Braden Holtby - $6,100,000
2017 - Marc-Andre Fleury - $5,750,000
2016 - Matt Murray - $550,000
2015 - Corey Crawford - $6,000,000
You're literally talking out of your ass.
Just because your GM foolishly committed double-digit AAV to your goalie - who happens to be good, and was once elite - doesn't mean that's the industry norm. And it certainly doesn't mean it's some sort of criterion for winning.
except any other skater that isnt a goalie can contribute goals for as well. a goalie cant.If the Habs retain down to $8M, it's no scarier than having Burns's contract.
BingoFun fact to further this, of the 15 highest paid goalies in the league this year, only 2 are about a .915%SVV (typical league average). They are Rask and Hellbuyck. Signing goalies to big ticket-long term contracts is scary business. Its a fragile position and also subjective to everyone else infront of you. Since the lockout, 27% of teams have bought-out a goalie contract.
I am looking at it both ways. I'm looking at what his stats are when the team in front of him is not horrible and I'm looking at his stats when the team in front of him is horrible. Both matter to me. You want to look at solely when the team is not trending well and say Price is the problem.
Price was dominate from Dec - Apr when the Habs were healthy and Price decided to step up. The evidence you will find is he is tired of a meh team in front of him and has checked out. Ability is not the question, confidence in the team in front of him is.
Said the same about Weber when people were all over him when he was hurt. It's propaganda.
Karlsson is probably a better comparable (with injury history, and consistency issues). But Burns too, maybe.
Difference is - a positional player can still be useful even if they decline some. So Burns (or Karlsson) may decline and go from one of the best defenders in the league to a low level first line D and still be very useful, or top 4 D with PP specialists...once Price declines a bit as a top goalie - he's useless. He's either a legit/strong #1 goalie - or he's not, and as a backup goalie he loses his value.
Price was paid $6.5M in his 20's. Some of those contracts are about to expire in case you didn't notice. Timing is everything and you are a fool if you think the past rate of $4M - $7M is still the rate in the coming years. What do you think Andersen ask for in a few seasons? Think about it
Binnington and Murray are rare cases. Do you think the Canes have that young goalie now or in the system? Maybe they can make a trade like the Leafs to get Andersen type at some point. Lots of teams looking for goalies and settle year after year in case you didn't notice.
If the Habs let Price walk as a UFA or traded him as a pending UFA a few season ago, you don't think some team gives him a similar contract? Give your head a shake
That contract is so brutal and long I doubt Car would do Reimer for Price at 50 percent. He's signed till....2030? He's....32???
That would be worse than what we got for Roy . Risks works two ways, not just one. If the Habs retain down to $8M, it's the right number to get teams involved. If you want the Habs to retain more, the return gets higher. No way in hell we are going to liquidate Price and give him to a contender for cheap like we did with Roy.
I would fire you as my GM if your plan was to run with meh goalies with that kind of roster potential. You will come to your senses over time. Maybe Price is not the guy but you need someone in net to win and the point is winning cups. When you are this close, you don't do nothing and run with goalies you don't have confidence in.
$4.3M for both your goalies on a cup contender? That's your plan year to year? Pretty sure you will be disappointed. What's your plan? To win a cup in 24/25?
None of the goalies I mentioned will get anything near Price's contract terms, if that's what you're getting at.
Rare cases
Except Binnington and Murray happened within 4 seasons of each other. How rare!
That's not my argument. My point - which is also everyone else's in this thread - is that you're not getting anything near what you think you would in a Price trade, even if you retain. It was a bad deal at the time, and it has aged ****ing horribly.
Enjoy Price and that contract. ****ing joke.