Proposal: Post-Game Threads

[The Macho King]

For discussion management reasons, I move that we go from using GDTs indefinitely to locking them up and using PGTs instead for discussion after the game. I just noticed that sometimes discussions were crossing three GDTs with discussions and it could get a bit confusing as to what was going on. This would keep it a little more easy to follow and eliminate some clutter.

Yay or Nay?

Click to read more...

 

[Leonardo87]

For discussion management reasons, I move that we go from using GDTs indefinitely to locking them up and using PGTs instead for discussion after the game. I just noticed that sometimes discussions were crossing three GDTs with discussions and it could get a bit confusing as to what was going on. This would keep it a little more easy to follow and eliminate some clutter.

Yay or Nay?

Yeah that's a very good idea. Other teams forums are doing that.

 

[Coopers Gum]

Personally against, I think it'd add to the clutter. If we could just lock up old GDTs as soon as the next game starts, that'd be easier I think.

 

[Hoek]

Personally against, I think it'd add to the clutter. If we could just lock up old GDTs as soon as the next game starts, that'd be easier I think.

I think this is better as well.

 

[2020 Cup Champions]

Personally against, I think it'd add to the clutter. If we could just lock up old GDTs as soon as the next game starts, that'd be easier I think.

This is better, I think

 

[Callum]

Putting a PGT in place for each game is a great idea.

For myself, I mostly watch the replays on Gamecenter Live because of my time zone. I'd love to be able to go straight to the PGT rather than having to sift through the GDT to find where the post-game comments start.

 

[snowden]

No. I will boycott the board if this happens. Your brand of Yzlam is not wanted here.

 

[xteesy]

Personally against, I think it'd add to the clutter. If we could just lock up old GDTs as soon as the next game starts, that'd be easier I think.

I'm for this one, no need for multiple threads. Just lock the old one.

 

[The Macho King]

Part of my logic comes down to a pgt not only discussing the game. It can also be used to discuss upcoming match ups more organically.

 

[DFC]

Part of my logic comes down to a pgt not only discussing the game. It can also be used to discuss upcoming match ups more organically.

I'm with this. There are also GDTs that spark conversation in other areas that don't feel right for any other thread, or a thread all its own, but is just as awkward carrying over into a new GDT. It's not like our board is super cluttered, especially compared to other boards.

 

[Kristia]

Never really had a need for a PGT here, because our GDT's don't normally break the 1000 post mark, so we have room in a GDT to talk post game.

 

[dechire]

I'm fine with either PGTs or locking old GDTs when the new one is posted. Don't really have a preference.

 

[The Gongshow]

We're a small group, we don't need post threads, just lock up other older games so theres no confusion. Most of our threads don't get too big anyways

 

[chasespace]

I'd prefer the continuation of the GDT until the new one is posted

 

[2016cupwinners]

I'd like the Bolts to mention the board address to get a few more warm bodies in here.

 

[The Gongshow]

I'd like the Bolts to mention the board address to get a few more warm bodies in here.

I'm sure, with the successful season they had last year, that we'll have a few new posters around here

 

[Werewolf]

Never really had a need for a PGT here, because our GDT's don't normally break the 1000 post mark, so we have room in a GDT to talk post game.

This.

 

[DFC]

As long as we don't lock the old GDT threads before the new game starts. Sometimes there's good discussion in those things that doesn't really have anything to do with the game, but doesn't belong anywhere else either.

 

[Sky04]

I'd prefer the continuation of the GDT until the new one is posted

I like this too.