Because of Dd.we have to say Rw, c and d
That's beside the point IMO. System? I say an upgrade at center helps the system. Maybe it's the right wing?
...The System is the most important part of a good team...play to your strengths, eliminate your weaknesses as much as possible...ask the Kings, Hawks, and Bruins...
...or should I have just said the coach??...
We need a #3 D badly. The Blue are contenders because they can roll Shattenkirk, Pietrangelo and Bouwemeester. Boston used to be able to roll Hamilton, Boychuck and Chara. Chicago had Seabrook, Keith and Leddy. That #3 D would do wonder for this organization. However I do think we can solve that internally with Tinordi emerging or Beaulieu
We also need another top 6 forward. Chuckie will become a #1 C but right now Pacioretty is the only legitimate winger. Scherbak will eventually evolve into that, same with McCarron (who is more of a 2nd liner). Right now, I'd target a top 6RW to replace Parenteau on that top line.
We need a #3 D badly. The Blue are contenders because they can roll Shattenkirk, Pietrangelo and Bouwemeester. Boston used to be able to roll Hamilton, Boychuck and Chara. Chicago had Seabrook, Keith and Leddy. That #3 D would do wonder for this organization. However I do think we can solve that internally with Tinordi emerging or Beaulieu
We also need another top 6 forward. Chuckie will become a #1 C but right now Pacioretty is the only legitimate winger. Scherbak will eventually evolve into that, same with McCarron (who is more of a 2nd liner). Right now, I'd target a top 6RW to replace Parenteau on that top line.
I believe we need to look at the right side of our defense. With Subban having a very average season start (for a player of his caliber), then you have Gonchar and Weaver, two very old D-men, and sometimes Gilbert, who does an honest job but isn't really a gamebreaker. This is probably the position that could be the improved the most, the problem is I don't see how we could do so short term without sacrificing valuable assets
an upgrade at C would be just as good.
Even the best teams have a 50 pts player on their 1st line. 70 pts Patches - 70 pts #1C - 50 pts RW would be just as good as 70 pts Patches - 50 pts #1 C - 70 pts RW.
I agree but I think a stronger center position can relief pressure on the D. We need more offense upfront. This is what? the 3rd SO in 20ish games?
I say a top line center. We don't have a go-to-guy.
-Galchenyuk I don't know if he's going to transition to center.
-Desharnais lacks size, heart
-Plekanec is a perfect #2 guy
-Eller is a very good #3 guy
-Malhotra is a great #4 guy
Center. DD is a huge downgrade from Gomez and that is saying something.
That's a bold claim. Granted, they're starting to look more and more similar, but at least DD makes half the salary Gomez did. DD might not be that superior to Gomez, but saying he's a HUGE downgrade is a stretch.
Left Wing.
We have good centres, not elite but very good. In the minors, we have a good RWer playing C in Andrighetto.
We have Galchenyuk also.
We have one legitimate LWer.
We have 6 D that are okay or better.
Again, LW.
Coaching. Also, DD.
Edit: Super contender
Pacioretty - XXXX - XXXX
Galchenyuk - Plekanec - Parenteau
Sekac - Eller - Gallagher
Prust - Malhotra - Weise
XXXX - Subban
Markov - XXXX
Emelin - Gilbert
Price
Tokarski