Frk It
Mo Seider Less Problems
- Jul 27, 2010
- 36,246
- 14,755
I think AA's real advantage is that he has the hands at full speed that I think Larkin doesn't, at least not to the same degree. And AA has speed that Nyquist doesn't have even if Nyquist's hands are about as good. That skill and speed combination is going to allow him to be more lethal. You can try to limit those opportunities but he's literally one of the fastest players, if not the fastest. Blash says he's faster than AA. Larkin was the fastest skater at the NHL All-Star game last season. Helm's speed somehow keeps him relevant, despite his hands. AA's got both.
Two things:
1: AA has not only the speed, but the hands to actually beat players 1-on-1 or split the D, meaning he's not as easy to force to the outside as Nyquist or even Larkin.
2: AA displays a lot of great tendencies in terms of slowing the play down and creating chances off actual o-zone play, probably more so than Larkin imo. He's also made some terrific passes this season that haven't been converted on, not his fault really when he's making them to Sheahan/Helm/Glendening/etc.
I have been saying he will be the best 1 on 1 player in the organization post-Datsyuk since he was playing in the OHL, so I share some of your sentiments here.
Just wanted to point out that great speed and great hands don't necessarily guarantee a great player. Max Afinogenov is a good example of that. He was a solid top 6 player, but his speed and stickhandling were both very high caliber.
We know the speed and hands are there, just have to see how the rest of his game rounds out.