Did the guy even watch the games?
What do you think?
Kuraly gets an F+ for winning faceoffs.After reading the article, the author was far too easy in the grades he handed out. Kuraly and Wagner alone getting C's screams that they weren't being objective. Those guys both deserve an F-, that's how terrible they were.
Kuraly gets an F+ for winning faceoffs.
Wagner gets some probably fake Greek letter that symbolizes a dead animal.
A++ | Marchand |
A+ | McAvoy |
A | Bergeron |
A- | Pastrnak |
B+ | Gryz |
B | Krejci |
B- | Smith |
C+ | Ritchie |
C | Carlo |
C- | Clifton |
D+ | Lauzon |
D | Miller |
D- | Coyle |
E+ | Zboril |
E | Kampfer |
E- | Frederic |
F+ | Studnicka |
F | Kuhlman |
F- | Kuraly |
F-- | Debrusk |
F--- | Wagner |
Gave Carlo a C and Zboril a B. Paid shill
The guy writes for the team owned broadcast partner. By definition he was very unlikely to be overly harsh or critical, which I expected. But still, his fluff piece was more embarrassing and spoke more about him than it did about the team or player's performance. The worst grade he gave was a C-, right? And that was to Moore, who played what, 5 games? It's silly.
I stand corrected as a lazy reader.Voting was based on role.
Hence, Carlo a C as the #3 dman. Zboril a B as a number 6.
Everybody gets a trophy!Nobody gets an F? or a D? This is like my kindergarten report card
Much MUCH better![TBODY] [/TBODY]
A++ Marchand A+ McAvoy A Bergeron A- Pastrnak B+ Gryz B Krejci B- Smith C+ Ritchie C Carlo C- Clifton D+ Lauzon D Miller D- Coyle E+ Zboril E Kampfer E- Frederic F+ Studnicka F Kuhlman F- Kuraly F-- Debrusk F--- Wagner
Better?
EDIT: Minimum 20 GP. No Goaltenders Included.