I never said that Subban was a poor skater, only that this talk about his being this great, elite puck transporting defenceman is somewhat misguided. Subban has many skating strengths, lateral skating ability, edge skating and strength on his skates, but he lacks straight line speed which limit his puck transporting ability and recovery speed. Its all a function of a wide, clunky and inefficient skating stride. Unless he winds up around the net he has no chance of beating the first forechecker. And others teams know it. They attack Subban, they have increasingly little respect for his skating speed. As a result, Subban, on most occasions is forced to turn back or weakly and unproductively, just flip the puck out into the neutral ice zone. Fans complain that he overhandles the puck. The reason he does that is can't beat players with his speed and he is forced to use head and hand fakes from largely a stationary position thus exposing the puck. There was a reason Team Canada was hesitant to choose him in the first place and was reluctant to play him after he was selected. The limitations in his skating would have made him a liability. But of course the guys on this and other sites ( the 14 year olds and insurance salesmen) know more than the best coaches in Canada. Subban is an entertaining and controversial player, who I'm afraid is far more sizzle than substance. I for one would be very hesitant to make him one of the highest paid players in the game. He's just not worth it.
It appears you like the sound of your voice a little too much. I bet you reread your post and tapped yourself in the back as well.
Talk about over analyzing.
PK doesn't skate as well as say Doughty or Keith, but I fail to see how this makes him a poor skater, a problematic one, or that he's more sizzle than substance. What a seriously stupid conclusion.
PK is a great skater, but he won't win a skate race versus the fast skaters. Turning that into a problem is quite the stretch.
A poor skater is a guy like Douglas Murray, a rather mediocre skater is a guy like Gorges, a decent but slow skater is a guy like Markov. PK is a good skater. He has a slow acceleration, that's it. Don't try too hard to be an analyst because that will lead you to make some pretty insane conclusions like ''PK being liable due to his skating''.
People say he over handles the puck because he tends to hang on to it a second too long, or because he tries things when he shouldn't. That has to do with timing, not his skating ability.
And for all the crap people are saying ''there's a reason why he wasn't played for team Canada, and that's cuz he's too big of a liability'', well who in their right mind would choose a player that's a liability?? Would you? Why? I wouldn't.
We know why PK didn't play much on Team Canada, they had said it before the selections were even made. It has nothing to do with liabilities or what not.
Babcock said it himself, he likes having 3 RD and 3 LD. Doughty and Weber were locks due to their experience and impact in last Olympics. They weren't going anywhere.
That left one RD spot. Then came the chemistry factor with Pietro-JayBo. These spots were already talked about before the selection for the team was even made.
They opted to go with Hamhuis as the 7th guy because the left side was much weaker than the right one. It's that simple. Nothing to do with PK being liable. If he was, he wouldn't have been chosen to begin with.
So enough about this idea that PK is a bad skater because his first couple steps aren't fast. Such a dumb idea.
As for more sizzle than substance, I won't even address that. But you sure killed all your cred there.