Riikola is excellent defensively. He deserves a consistent spot in the lineup next year.
No he's not.
Riikola is an adventure defensively and has a tendency to make boneheaded decisions that lead to odd-man breaks. He's definitely better than Johnson so he should be in over Johnson, but him putting up great analytical results in a super sheltered role doesn't make him excellent defensively.
That is...uh, surprising I'd say.
I guess it's a fine amount of money for a #7D, but I really don't get the vibe that Sullivan trusts him much. Also, where are these changes to the defense if you just keep everyone and re-sign all of your UFAs and RFAs?
No. You totally should.Hey guys, has anyone made the cough lozenges joke yet?
He is a capable 6/7 guy.No he's not.
Riikola is an adventure defensively and has a tendency to make boneheaded decisions that lead to odd-man breaks. He's definitely better than Johnson so he should be in over Johnson, but him putting up great analytical results in a super sheltered role doesn't make him excellent defensively.
Not gonna lie , i was waiting for this post while scrolling down
Happy that he was signed again