Because Sullivan and company are morons.Curious why he hasn't gotten a look yet with the Pens. He seemed to pop in some of the WBS games I saw this year.
Very wrong people will say "Sullivan", even though he famously plays younger players (that are worth playing) and is actually highly respected for his thoughts on developing young talent (it's featured by USA Hockey, in fact).Curious why he hasn't gotten a look yet with the Pens. He seemed to pop in some of the WBS games I saw this year.
Has some intriguing offensive talent. I wish him the best when he inevitably goes back to Finland next year after another 80 games in WBS.
Considering USA hockey's past choices for head coaches (Bylsma), I'm not sure they're this big authority on determining quality of coaches. They just seem to be high on whatever American coach at that specific moment has won a Cup lately, regardless of whether or not that coach is actually any good.Very wrong people will say "Sullivan", even though he famously plays younger players (that are worth playing) and is actually highly respected for his thoughts on developing young talent (it's featured by USA Hockey, in fact).
Rust, Sheary, and Murray all played under Sully in WBS and were key players in the early Sullivan Cup years. Guentzel likely didn't come to WBS until Sully was promoted, but he is also the last prospect the Pens have had that was just too good to ignore.*Note: this wasn't always the case. Not sure what happened to Sullivan between the 2016/2017 seasons when guys like Sheary and Guentzel got long looks versus how he coaches young skill guys from around 2019 and on.
I'm talking about coaching clinics and continuing learning. Not about superficial stuff like national team duty and the like. Having heard them both speak, Sullivan really, really knows the game.Considering USA hockey's past choices for head coaches (Bylsma), I'm not sure they're this big authority on determining quality of coaches. They just seem to be high on whatever American coach at that specific moment has won a Cup lately, regardless of whether or not that coach is actually any good.
Very wrong people will say "Sullivan", even though he famously plays younger players (that are worth playing) and is actually highly respected for his thoughts on developing young talent (it's featured by USA Hockey, in fact).
The real answer is Puustinen is a 5'9" winger with average skating. Not necessarily from a pure speed perspective, from his stride fluidity and just overall athleticism, it's the small area stuff that he's not good at and it greatly reduces his ability. It's really noticeable in his skill chaining, it has to hit on the rhythm of his dominant foot in order for it to have any chance of success...otherwise, he's losing the puck or he's getting knocked off of it...
In WBS, where there are exactly 0 skill players that are worth a damn...he has to really pick his spots, while still being a play driver...that's too much for him to manage consistently. So, sometimes he slinks back into being a - I don't know - like a Teemu Pulkkinen type...which is fine, because he can shoot (not as well as Pulkkinen, but it's a good shot...) but he's way better if he can just focus on his "A" game because he really doesn't have a "B" game, that's why he was so effective with a playmaker like Petri Kontiola because Kontiola has pace control and Puustinen doesn't. So the game gets too fast for Puustinen and then he fails.
I found a note from July 2021 that I had made about him, it still holds for me...
"
It's weird, he's just not that impactful compared to his numbers. I like that he doesn't score a lot of "junior" goals. The goals that he scores have some pop to them, he scores from in-close or he scores PP one-timers or catch and release goals. But none of this really looks NHL quality. It's good, but it's not quite good enough for me.
We signed him, which you'd expect when you draft a 20 year old. You usually have a sense that you're gonna be able to bring him over. I think he'll do well in the AHL, but I have doubts about his NHL ability right now."
##
He was a 60/40 "sure, I'll qualify him because there's nothing else going on in WBS and he's not in anyone's way..." but when he goes back to Finland next year, I don't think I'm gonna burn a candle for him...
No sweat. I have it my head that you're a Sabres fan (forgive me if that's untrue), but if you're still interested in taking a chance on him...I'd swap him for the rights to Jake Richard, as that would just restart the lifecycle on Puustinen, effectively.Appreciate the feedback.
He's one of those players who's essentially a 'Top Six or nothing' player, and the Top Six was healthy for nearly all of last season.Curious why he hasn't gotten a look yet with the Pens. He seemed to pop in some of the WBS games I saw this year.
No sweat. I have it my head that you're a Sabres fan (forgive me if that's untrue), but if you're still interested in taking a chance on him...I'd swap him for the rights to Jake Richard, as that would just restart the lifecycle on Puustinen, effectively.
Failing that, I'd accept the rights to Aaron Huglen and a conditional 7th...
I think everything about this post has aged as well as Mike Sullivan’s coaching the last 4 years.Very wrong people will say "Sullivan", even though he famously plays younger players (that are worth playing) and is actually highly respected for his thoughts on developing young talent (it's featured by USA Hockey, in fact).
The real answer is Puustinen is a 5'9" winger with average skating. Not necessarily from a pure speed perspective, from his stride fluidity and just overall athleticism, it's the small area stuff that he's not good at and it greatly reduces his ability. It's really noticeable in his skill chaining, it has to hit on the rhythm of his dominant foot in order for it to have any chance of success...otherwise, he's losing the puck or he's getting knocked off of it...
In WBS, where there are exactly 0 skill players that are worth a damn...he has to really pick his spots, while still being a play driver...that's too much for him to manage consistently. So, sometimes he slinks back into being a - I don't know - like a Teemu Pulkkinen type...which is fine, because he can shoot (not as well as Pulkkinen, but it's a good shot...) but he's way better if he can just focus on his "A" game because he really doesn't have a "B" game, that's why he was so effective with a playmaker like Petri Kontiola because Kontiola has pace control and Puustinen doesn't. So the game gets too fast for Puustinen and then he fails.
I found a note from July 2021 that I had made about him, it still holds for me...
"
It's weird, he's just not that impactful compared to his numbers. I like that he doesn't score a lot of "junior" goals. The goals that he scores have some pop to them, he scores from in-close or he scores PP one-timers or catch and release goals. But none of this really looks NHL quality. It's good, but it's not quite good enough for me.
We signed him, which you'd expect when you draft a 20 year old. You usually have a sense that you're gonna be able to bring him over. I think he'll do well in the AHL, but I have doubts about his NHL ability right now."
##
He was a 60/40 "sure, I'll qualify him because there's nothing else going on in WBS and he's not in anyone's way..." but when he goes back to Finland next year, I don't think I'm gonna burn a candle for him...
And the power play has massively improved with him on the top unit. A few lucky bounces, yes, but 6 PP goals in 4 games after a big fat 0 for nearly a month is quite the change.6 career games, 5 points, sure its a small sample size but... maybe they should have called him up sooner and not let him stay that long in the A.