Pick 2 to start a team (Fedorov, Sakic, Forsberg, Malkin, Yzerman, Crosby)

Discussion in 'The History of Hockey' started by MartyMarts, Jun 28, 2017.

  1. Boxscore

    Boxscore Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    10,490
    Likes Received:
    2,041
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    USA
    Home Page:
    Crosby and Forsberg. Incredible 1-2 monster.
     
  2. SovietWings

    SovietWings Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2017
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Pardubice
    #1 Forsberg - the greatest of this group to watch for me
    #2 Fedorov - really liked him in Detroit,great un the secondary role but always able to be the #1 (same applies to Malkin,but this is my Detroit homer pick..I didn't choose Yzermsn,so I have to choose Fedorov :) )
     
  3. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    29,552
    Likes Received:
    3,331
    Trophy Points:
    232
    OMG,... Post #28. I'm the only one to choose Joe Sakic & Steve Yzerman. :facepalm:
     
  4. psycat

    psycat Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Location:
    Linkoping Sweden
    Crosby
    Malkin/Forsberg (Leaning towards Malkin)

    (This is if I dont know that they will be hurt as much as they in reality were if that's the case I would pick Crosby+Sakic/Yzerman leaning towards Sakic).

    So two different answers really. Can tell you this much wouldnt pick Fedorov since Forsberg was just a better version of him.
     
  5. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    29,552
    Likes Received:
    3,331
    Trophy Points:
    232
    They were VERY different styles of player!
     
    Lyle Chipperson likes this.
  6. Damisoph

    Damisoph Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    8,478
    Likes Received:
    1,600
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Crosby and Forsberg for me.
     
  7. KoozNetsOff 92

    KoozNetsOff 92 Hala Madrid

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    5,139
    Likes Received:
    2,420
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Assuming full health, Crosby and Forsberg.
     
  8. bathdog

    bathdog Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Nope. Me too. Possibly Sakic/Crosby.

    If injuries/motivational issues are exluded, and I get peak form.

    Forsberg/Crosby or Forsberg/Fedorov.
     
  9. The Panther

    The Panther Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    10,032
    Likes Received:
    3,516
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    In terms of how I personally evaluate these 6 players in terms of their respective prime years, it's probably like this:

    Crosby
    Forsberg

    Yzerman / Sakic

    Fedorov / Malkin

    (sorry to the Russians)

    As to which two I'd take for a team, it would obviously depend on the particular needs of the team I'm starting, but it would be hard not to take Cros and Fors.
     
  10. SCampo98

    SCampo98 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sherbrooke, QC
    Personally I split these players up into two categories - The leaders and the skill players. While some fit into both, I view the leaders as Yzerman, Crosby, and Sakic, while the skill players where therefore be Malkin, Forsberg, and Fedorov. I think this involves a bit of recency bias, but I'm going to take Crosby and Malkin. IMO the other tandems had better teams around them when they won their cups. Yzerman/Fedorov had Larionov, Fetisov, Kozlov, Shanahan, Lidstrom, Hull, Robataille, Chelios, and Datsyuk. Sakic/Forsberg had Kamensky, Foote, Roy, Hejduk, Tanguay, Bourque and Blake.

    The only players of similar calibre Crosby/Malkin had on their cup wining teams were Fleury, Kessel, and Letang. That's pretty much the reason why my pick is Crosby/Malkin.
     
  11. Sadekuuro

    Sadekuuro Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,784
    Likes Received:
    331
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Occupation:
    mad scientist
    Location:
    Seattle
    But Crosby/Malkin are also beating weaker teams than those teams played against. There aren't any really stacked teams anymore.
     
  12. VanIslander

    VanIslander Don't waste my time

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Messages:
    29,552
    Likes Received:
    3,331
    Trophy Points:
    232
    I didn't pick Forsberg because his injuries are an inherent risk of his style of play. Petr protected the puck with his body and would crouch and absorb hits. I always feared he'd bust a gut and indeed he did (ruptured spleen) to go along with rib, shoulder and hip injuries.

    [​IMG]

    (Similarly, Adam Deadmarsh was injury prone due to his style of play, which was very different than Forsberg's but equally damaging; Deader threw his body into checks everywhere on the ice with wild abandon that was a pleasure to watch but scary at times in terms of bodily risk.)
     
  13. HawkNut

    HawkNut Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2017
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I'll take Crosby and Yzerman, assuming they're healthy, and if injuries are a factor, give me Malkin in Crosby's place.
     
  14. bathdog

    bathdog Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    46
    This statement made me curious, Malkin isn't exactly ironman.
     
  15. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    18,689
    Likes Received:
    1,693
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    Accordingly the other duos had much better supporting casts.
     
  16. bathdog

    bathdog Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    46
    The Avs duo contributed as much or more of their teams offense. Wings were clearly deeper and rolled lines to a larger degree.
     
  17. ITM

    ITM As Long As It Takes

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    3,225
    Likes Received:
    880
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Fedorov: I guess there are a number of opinions that simply weren't informed by watching hockey in the 90s...Because Sergei Fedorov a two-time Selke winner (while scoring over a 100 points) was something special to watch. Best skater in the league, could play as a defenceman (as deemed acceptable by Scotty Bowman) and was absolutely relentless against opposition and always seemed like he could score more if he wanted to and often times scored when his team needed him to. His playoff scoring average was superb as well.

    Crosby: With a 100+ point Selke winning best skater (maybe in the history of hockey) secured as my second line centre, I'd take Sidney Crosby as my first. Call it will, skill, whatever...Crosby's back to back Conn Smythes supporting the rest of his trophy case and his post-season scoring record make his selection as a number one centre as certain as it can be given the pool. And while I see positives in the best games Forsberg, Sakic and Yzerman, I'd be waxing nostalgic if I denied Crosby's numbers commensurate with his generation's and those previous - with all due respect.
     
  18. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    18,689
    Likes Received:
    1,693
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    The amount of offense contributed respectively by each duo has nothing to do with what I said. Sakic and Forsberg were not carrying an underdog Avs team all those years. They were in fact one of the stacked teams that the other poster was referring to. Whether one thinks the teams are or are not more evenly matched in the Cap era should not affect how each player is measured.

    But on the topic of scoring distribution, where I see a difference between the Avs duo and the Pens duo is the PPG of the next best scorers on their teams.

    From 96 to 04, the other Top Ten scorers on the AVs had an average PPG of 0.74.

    http://www.nhl.com/stats/player?agg...mesPlayed,gte,1&sort=points,goals,gamesPlayed


    From 07 to 17, the other Top Ten scorers on the Pens had an average PPG of 0.58

    http://www.nhl.com/stats/player?agg...mesPlayed,gte,1&sort=points,goals,gamesPlayed

    That shows a clear difference in the level of support each duo had although the 96-04 period was slightly lower scoring so it's closer to .74 to .60.
     
  19. daver

    daver Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2003
    Messages:
    18,689
    Likes Received:
    1,693
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Home Page:
    If no injuries, Crosby/Forsberg.
     
  20. authentic

    authentic Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2015
    Messages:
    14,645
    Likes Received:
    2,063
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Huh?
     
  21. MadLuke

    MadLuke Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,793
    Likes Received:
    423
    Trophy Points:
    94
    They missed a lot of games (LTIR: long term injured reserve)
     
  22. authentic

    authentic Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2015
    Messages:
    14,645
    Likes Received:
    2,063
    Trophy Points:
    141
    If we're starting from scratch a lot of those injuries could easily not happen, especially in Crosby's case where a lot of his seemed to be bad luck. I'd also take my chances with Forsberg and tell him to tone it down a bit in the regular season while saving his best for the playoffs, and at his best him and Crosby are the best playoff centers since the late 90s.
     
  23. TheAngryHank

    TheAngryHank Expert

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    Messages:
    11,666
    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Fedorov
    Stevie
     
  24. bathdog

    bathdog Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2016
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Seriously?

    Avs were always favorites vs DET and DAL?

    You don't think the post-lockout Pens have generally been favorites vs anyone in the East but maybe Caps?

    Not sure where you're trying to head with this. I, too, think Avs were better than Pens, but, they still scored less both in raw (3.02 g/gp vs 2.99 g/gp) and relative (1st vs 2nd (DPE Wings)) numbers, which probably means their average competition was much stronger.

    Most of the names you use were linemates of Forsberg/Sakic, you can just as easily say they elevated their linemates to a larger degree.
     
  25. SatanwasaSlovak

    SatanwasaSlovak Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    119
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Occupation:
    Zzzzzz
    Location:
    Malmö, Skåne
    Forsberg and Yzerman.

    Temped to go with Sakic, but i like Forsberg's aggressive way of playing. And Yzerman will be the leader and the star of the team.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"