FlareKnight
Registered User
Why, not I'll take a crack at it. Will get ripped for it later, but oh well. Such is the way it goes on forums.I am trying to figure out what is making people upset
Is it that Kapanen isn't Maata or Pouliot?
Kapanen seems to be very high on everything that this organization wants (smarts, speed, skill - his shot is off, according to his draft profile on TSN). and he's young and can be developed within the system.
Is it because Harrington isn't a blue chip himself?
Okay, that's fair, but if he can provide 22 minutes of solid defense, and buys into Babcock's system, is that horrendous?
Is that we had to retain?
well I think the obvious choice was to take cap dumps but the cap dumps didn't want to come here. (everyone who has a questionable contract had a No Trade/Move, and
the Leafs were on it).
Is it that we had to give up the 2nd?
okay, but Pittsburgh didn't want to have first 2 rounds being pick-less. (one could even argue this builds better trade relations. I don't know).
Is it that we had to double protect the 1st rounder?
everyone protects the first rounder. What I'm not understanding is why we don't get a 1st period, so that is the eyebrow raiser for me.
I am really trying to be open minded here - because other than not having "elite talent" coming back (to which the argument was 6 years ago the 1st rounders were supposed to be, middle of the pack, and see how Boston developed them). And it looks like to me that's exactly what we got back. (PLUS cap space, PLUS a rebuilding structure PLUS a new financial dichotomy with in the organization - our highest paid player (on Forward) is Nathan Horton).
Is it that Kapanen isn't Maata or Pouliot?
Honestly, I don't care on this one. I'm not worried who he isn't. Solid skillset. Though ironic that our big part of this trade is a guy with inconsistent effort levels. Sounds a bit like someone we were pretty desperate to get rid of yesterday. Odds seem pretty good for a second line winger which is fine, you do need those.
Is it because Harrington isn't a blue chip himself?
I shrug on this one. It's nice to have, but you can also sign those guys pretty simply on the UFA market. Don't feel it's a plus or a negative, just saves us a bit of time signing someone to do the same job.
Is that we had to retain?
I'll certainly go with yeah on that one. If the cap dumps didn't want to go here then keep looking. Since when did it have to be the Pens or bust? In the end it's like taking on a buyout which rarely anyone will like. You are spending cap for him not to play here.
Is it that we had to give up the 2nd?
I can understand why the Pens wanted their second back, I don't understand why we gave it up. Or why we bent over backwards in several respects of this trade.
Is it that we had to double protect the 1st rounder?
We certainly don't protect them....Plus I rarely hear about anyone lotto protecting their picks, much less double protecting them.
In the end I think we got a pretty sorry return. Oh well, such is life for the Leafs. I think it's possible to be fine with moving forward with the rebuild and also think we did a poor trading our best player. Here's hoping that Kapanen turns out really well and we luck out with the first (or whatever we trade it for).
At least this move sets the expectations low going forward. We'll trade the core, but they won't be good trades. Just have to hope all the losing will lead to success down the road.