King Henry I said:I like it. How about Robyn Big Snake vs. Sidney Crosby? As of this point, of course
King Henry I said:I like it. How about Robyn Big Snake vs. Sidney Crosby? As of this point, of course
Extinguisher said:Crosby, not even close.
Not because of the hype machine or anything, but neither of these guys have played a regular season game in the NHL, so I'll go with the guy that absolutely owned the QMJHL the last few years.
Perry owned the OHL, whats your point?Extinguisher said:Crosby, not even close.
Not because of the hype machine or anything, but neither of these guys have played a regular season game in the NHL, so I'll go with the guy that absolutely owned the QMJHL the last few years.
Jaded-Fan said:Slow night at HF boards?
I read a book once (not kidding) that speculated how the civil war would have been changed had people come from the future bearing AK-47's and given them to General Lee. Wonderfully bad scene where General Lee says 'look at 'em things shoot!' . . . anyways, this thread sort of reminds me of that level of bad speculation that had to have been born out of sheer boredom or perversity to come up with.
RallyKiller said:Perry owned the OHL, whats your point?
Crosby is better but i'm not sure how much you can use that argument, since perry also dominated his league.
Didn't crosby also play in a better offensive league? i'm not as familiar with the Q, just recall it being a good offensive league.hockeyman28 said:crosby and its not even close. Crosby completely dominated the Q, Perry was not even CLOSE to as dominant in the OHL. Even on the best junior team ever, Perry could not score as much.
actually im pretty sure the OHL was the highest scoring league last year. Perry was playing on a better team. the best comparison we can make is a percentage of teams points. Crosby scored 168 pts in 62 games, and his whole team scored 333 goals, just about 50.5% of his teams total production (even though he missed 8 games, Im pretty sure this is the highest percentage for this statistic ever, excluding lemieux's 282 pt season, where lemieux played in every game). Crosby was also a +78. Corey Perry had 130 points in 60 games, and the london knights scored 310 goals, roughly 41.9% of his teams total production (he missed 10 games though). He was a +66. So, statistically, crosby was dominant in their respective leagues for their respective teams.RallyKiller said:Didn't crosby also play in a better offensive league? i'm not as familiar with the Q, just recall it being a good offensive league.
perry had 130 points in 60 regular season games and 38 in 18 post season games. again I agree crosby is better, just don't agree with the minor league argument since perry also had a great year and took home MVP honors.
hockeyman28 said:actually im pretty sure the OHL was the highest scoring league last year. Perry was playing on a better team. the best comparison we can make is a percentage of teams points. Crosby scored 168 pts in 62 games, and his whole team scored 333 goals, just about 50.5% of his teams total production (even though he missed 8 games, Im pretty sure this is the highest percentage for this statistic ever, excluding lemieux's 282 pt season, where lemieux played in every game). Crosby was also a +78. Corey Perry had 130 points in 60 games, and the london knights scored 310 goals, roughly 41.9% of his teams total production (he missed 10 games though). He was a +66. So, statistically, crosby was dominant in their respective leagues for their respective teams.
RallyKiller said:Didn't crosby also play in a better offensive league?
who said perry was better than getzlaf?TransportedUpstater said:Statistics cannot accurately show how many more light years ahead Crosby is compared to Perry.
Perry's not even the best 2003 draft pick on his own team.
Not at 16.RallyKiller said:Perry owned the OHL, whats your point?
Crosby is better but i'm not sure how much you can use that argument, since perry also dominated his league.
Jaded-Fan said:Slow night at HF boards?
I read a book once (not kidding) that speculated how the civil war would have been changed had people come from the future bearing AK-47's and given them to General Lee. Wonderfully bad scene where General Lee says 'look at 'em things shoot!' . . . anyways, this thread sort of reminds me of that level of bad speculation that had to have been born out of sheer boredom or perversity to come up with.
Turtledove, Guns of the SouthJaded-Fan said:Slow night at HF boards?
I read a book once (not kidding) that speculated how the civil war would have been changed had people come from the future bearing AK-47's and given them to General Lee. Wonderfully bad scene where General Lee says 'look at 'em things shoot!' . . . anyways, this thread sort of reminds me of that level of bad speculation that had to have been born out of sheer boredom or perversity to come up with.
Fripp said:Perry rocks and all, but anyone stats would be inflated playing on one of the best jr teams ever.