Personal thoughts on our various d-men:
Quincey: Gets crapped on way too much here. He's coming from a very different system and still doesn't have a huge amount of games under his belt. Quincey's glaring weaknesses are poor decision making, the transition game, and a penchant for taking very dumb minor penalties. He also doesn't use his size much in an aggressively physical role. On the other hand, he has good vision in the offensive zone, once he's there, and good positioning in the defensive zone, once he's there (it's the transition game that kills him). He's a good shot blocker and has a pretty decent toolkit in regards to stick skills and shot selection, and I think we'll see a bit more of this from him once he settles more on the team. In the meantime, he needs to remain a staple on the PK, and I wouldn't mind keeping him around on the PP. 1st pairing PK time, 2nd pairing PP time and bottom pair ES time is the way to go with KFQ.
Kronwall: Honestly, the biggest impression I get from Kronwall is that he's trying to do way too much (and thus is doing more harm than good defensively). He's still got great offensive vision and is a contributor there, and while his point shot isn't spectacular, he's a great guy to fling the puck around on the PP. Kronwall's biggest problem, aside from trying to fill Lidstrom's skates too much, is the lack of a suitable partner; he needs to be partnered with a guy that has a solid point shot as far as the PP goes and a defense first guy at ES that lets him play his game. Dear Babcock: that isn't Lashoff. This brings us to...
Ericsson: The Big E has been very solid this year. He can safely eat ES minutes, he's one of the few dmen regularly physically engaging at the moment, and is a very solid PKer. Babs needs to stop trying to roll balanced pairings and just stick him next to Kronwall. Unlike Kronwall, he's useful near our own net. He's got a very solid and crisp first pass that can help get crap moving out of the zone, and is almost always thinking 'safe play'. For a more controversial opinion, I'd like to see him given a few games on the PP, next to Kronwall. The caveat here is he needs to be given instructions to keep it simple: don't try to make any fancy plays, either unload your slapper from the point if there's traffic in front or toss it to the easy pass and let Datsyuk/Kronwall/Zetterberg make playmaking magic if not. This could ultimately be a failed experiment, but experiment is something the team needs to do at this point and given time and space, Ericsson has one of the biggest slappers on the team.
Huskins: This guy is pretty much getting paid to do one thing and he does it decently. Bottom pairing, eat some time, be safe defensively, PK a bit. He does that, he's paid a fair price for what he does, I have no more to say about Huskins.
Lashoff: He's a young, new to the NHL player and he needs more sheltered minutes. Putting him next to Kronwall is a train wreck. Stick him on the bottom pair, let him take some easy ES minutes and -occasionally- chip in PK time when other defenders need a rest. I think if he's allowed to stick to a low minute, simple game for now he can be a decent minute eater. What's currently being expected of him is quite frankly unfair to him in terms of development and contrary to his history as a hockey player.
Colaiacovo: I'll pretend this guy is ever going to be healthy and simply comment he has good potential to be a point contributor and PP guy for this team. He's unspectacular but respectable defensively at ES. Wouldn't want to see him on the PK much. Could add a bit of speed to the transition game.
White: The only RH dman we've got. White can see some top pairing time when you stick him next to a guy like Lidstrom, but not next to anything that we currently have. With this roster, he's a #3/4 guy that can contribute on both ends of the ice. Reasonably physically, reasonably good defense, reasonably good offense.. he's not gonna blow your mind at anything, but he's not a skating pile of fail at anything either.
Smith: He needs to be given an opportunity to play next to someone relatively stable so he can open up his own game. He's also too talented not to see a decent amount of minutes. To me, I think White is the best fit here. White can reasonably cover 2nd pairing ES minutes with him, can give a reasonable amount of cover defensively and has the offensive talent to make something out of Smith's own playmaking. As these two are both above average skaters from the back end, they have the potential to be a dynamic pairing.
Kindl: Kindl needs to watch the minor penalties. He's got a bit of a bad penchant for taking them at the moment. It reminds me a bit of Big E when he was settling into the NHL. However, his play is otherwise decent. He's a good skater for his size, has a decent set of tools, and is willing to try both physical play and offensive contribution. Give him time and he'll figure out how he fits best, but he's not really been given much consistent time to this point.
Looking at the group of d-men as a whole, this is what I'd like to see with a healthy roster:
ES pairings:
Kronwall - Ericsson
Smith - White
Quincey - Colaiacovo/Kindl
Spare: Huskins
AHL first call up: Lashoff
IR, most likely: Colaiacovo
Thoughts on the pairings:
1: As mentioned above, Krownall needs a defense first partner. Ericsson is probably the safest pick at this point, fills in a lot of Kronwall's weaknesses, and arguably plays the right side of the ice with more composure than Stuart.
2: Likewise as mentioned above, this is a pairing with above average skating. White isn't amazing defensively, but is stable enough to give Smith some freedom. Likewise, White is likely enough to pinch and contribute offensively that it'll give Smith some important time playing the defensive role of the pair.
3: Both Colaiacovo and Kindl have a better transition game than Quincey, making up for his weakness there. At his own end of the ice, Quincey can block shots and clog lanes, and he should be able to contribute decent offense with either d-man once he settles a bit more onto the Wings. Particularly in the case of Colaiacovo, should he ever be healthy, Cola+KFQ could be a bottom pairing that's surprisingly dangerous offensively.
PK:
Quincey - Ericsson
Kindl/Huskins - White
The first pairing is a very obvious pick. I feel comfortable saying these are our best 2 PKers at the moment, and they have past experience as a pairing. Ericsson seems capable of eating big minutes in general, while limited ES time keeps Quincey fresh for the PK.
White is the obvious choice for the second pairing, as he's a reasonably good shot blocker for his size and has solid 2-way acumen. Kindl and Huskins are obvious choices as a partner; Huskins is defensively safe and reliably. Kindl has shown a decent job of using his size to jam lanes.
On the whole, this PK isn't going to be amazing, but hopefully it can get the job done a reasonable amount. Kronwall needs to be kept off the PK as much as possible; his skills contribute very little to the role and it usually highlights his weaknesses. Cola doesn't need to be given any extra opportunities to get injured, should he be healthy.
PP:
Kronwall - Ericsson(!)
Smith - White
See my above thoughts on Ericsson to see why I'd like to see him be given a shot on the PP. Failing that, try Smith with him and play KFQ next to White. As we have several d-men that are good at pinching, play a RH forward on each PP line (Brunner, Samuelsson) to drop back to the point for a possible shot when the D pinch. This can also work when the left side d-man pinches, at least on the first line where you have Z as an option.