shureshot66
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 11,031
- 35
http://penguins.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=725936
Pretty sure he's exempt from waivers for one more season. So there's some flexibility there if needed.
So if he plays more than 42 games he will be an RFA? Weird.Good to have him in the fold. He'll still be an RFA next summer andhas 21 NHL games remaining on his waiver exemption. Weird number, though. It's less than his QO so he must be getting a fat raise from the 70k he earned in the minors last season.
Edit: Scratch that, he will be a group VI UFA next summer unless he plays at least 42 games for Pittsburgh this season.
So if he plays more than 42 games he will be an RFA? Weird.
Group VI unrestricted free agency is designed to give a better chance to players stuck on a deep roster. They must be 25+, have at least 3 pro seasons but fewer than 80 NHL games played. Megna will be 25 with 3 pro seasons next summer, and currently has 38 games. If he spends half the season in Pittsburgh he won't qualify for group VI anymore and be restricted again. On the other hand he will be waiver-eligible once he hits 22 games this year. Meaning we'd have to waive him first before we can send him down to WBS mid-season. So either he really makes the team, and we keep him as RFA. Or he doesn't make the jump and is likely lost on either waivers or next summer in free agency. Works for me.
Group VI unrestricted free agency is designed to give a better chance to players stuck on a deep roster. They must be 25+, have at least 3 pro seasons but fewer than 80 NHL games played. Megna will be 25 with 3 pro seasons next summer, and currently has 38 games. If he spends half the season in Pittsburgh he won't qualify for group VI anymore and be restricted again. On the other hand he will be waiver-eligible once he hits 22 games this year. Meaning we'd have to waive him first before we could send him down to WBS mid-season. So either he really makes the team, and we keep him as RFA. Or he doesn't make the jump and is likely lost on either waivers or next summer in free agency. Works for me.
is that a 22 game stretch or 22 games total?
is that a 22 game stretch or 22 games total?
i believe its a total of 22 games while on the roster. Not GP, either. Just on the roster for a total of 22
Couldn't they bring him up half way through the season and then keep him up their until the summer?
I guess so, should work on paper at least.
i believe its a total of 22 games while on the roster. Not GP, either. Just on the roster for a total of 22
22 total games. But I believe it is games actually played, not just spent on the roster. Anyway waiver eligiblity is one of the most arcane things in the CBA. I'm going by what capgeek.com says in their waiver calculator but who knows the exact interpretation of that.
I guess so, should work on paper at least.
Was thinking he'd end up signing a deal which is closer to the league min (as it would make it easier for him to crack the NHL roster) but with a big AHL raise.
Was thinking he'd end up signing a deal which is closer to the league min (as it would make it easier for him to crack the NHL roster) but with a big AHL raise.