Burgs
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2005
- 6,761
- 7
Samuelsson (38.46%) and Zlobin (37.50%) ended up virtually tied so we're having another 24 hour runoff. Seems like a choice between readiness and potential.
Kevin Hayes
Dead heat! 32 to 32!
I think Samuelsson is more of a "sure thing" but like Zlobin's potential.
Seems like a choice between readiness and potential.
I do not believe this should be a matter of readiness versus potential, because I really do not think that there is a significant difference in potential.
Zlobin may seem more alluring, but that's only because of our relative depth on D versus weakness at forward. But Zlobin does NOT have top line upside, and he doesn't really look like a player who would be a strong and prototypical 3rd liner either. So realistically, Zlobin's upside (if he reaches it) is probably more of a second line complementary winger, and more of a boom or bust type of player.
Samuelsson is a guy whose ultimate upside is a solid 2nd pairing Dman, which is a commodity that is equally (and perhaps even more) valuable than a 2nd line winger. Additionally, Samuelsson looks like he's at least a good bet to be a solid 3rd pairing Dman at worst, whether that happens on our team or another. So it looks as if he's more of a sure bet, and the upside between the two is the same.
If we were really voting on upside, I think it's very clear that the choice should be Jake Guentzel. He's clearly the most skilled guy on the board, and is coming off a freshman season that could only be described as highly successful and as good as or better than could be hoped for. Scott Wilson, secondarily, is another guy who has been very productive and I believe has more pure upside than Zlobin.
Just my 2 cents.
Samuelsson is a guy whose ultimate upside is a solid 2nd pairing Dman, which is a commodity that is equally (and perhaps even more) valuable than a 2nd line winger. Additionally, Samuelsson looks like he's at least a good bet to be a solid 3rd pairing Dman at worst, whether that happens on our team or another. So it looks as if he's more of a sure bet, and the upside between the two is the same.
cant believe a potential 7th defenseman is beating a potential top 6 winger...
I do not believe this should be a matter of readiness versus potential, because I really do not think that there is a significant difference in potential.
If we were really voting on upside, I think it's very clear that the choice should be Jake Guentzel. He's clearly the most skilled guy on the board, and is coming off a freshman season that could only be described as highly successful and as good as or better than could be hoped for. Scott Wilson, secondarily, is another guy who has been very productive and I believe has more pure upside than Zlobin.