Xscout*
Registered User
- Feb 9, 2014
- 750
- 0
Isles fan here. That was one of the worst and weakest calls I have ever seen.
This dude's alright.
Isles fan here. That was one of the worst and weakest calls I have ever seen.
This is from the NHL rulebook , 57.3 Penalty Shot, someone please point out if this is inaccurate:
[/LIST]
You're right, but it doesn't mean he had no control on the outcome of said penalty shot.
I never said that.
"The fact that the player got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and the player was denied a “more” reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should still be awarded."Condition 3 was not met. Blown call. Replay shows it clear as day. The (flubbed) shot got off fine. No chance was prevented.
Basically.Awful call, but more often than not the refs will call as soon as they see the stick in the hands. Hardly new.
Awful call, but more often than not the refs will call as soon as they see the stick in the hands. Hardly new.
"The fact that the player got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and the player was denied a “more†reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should still be awarded."
If Hunwick didn't actually make contact, then that's just bad luck for the Leafs.
This is from the NHL rulebook , 57.3 Penalty Shot, someone please point out if this is inaccurate:
[/LIST]
Not saying he got it right, I'm outlining the possible justification for it, since people seem to think it was a conspiracy, completely unfounded, worst call in hockey history, etc. Even with all the replays in this thread from different angles, there's still some uncertainty towards whether or not contact was made.Also calling conditions 1 and 2 not met.
No infraction was present.
Blown badly.
Not saying he got it right, I'm outlining the possible justification for it, since people seem to think it was a conspiracy or completely unfounded, or the worst call in hockey history. Even with all the replays in this thread from different angles, there's still some ambivalence towards whether or not contact was made.
Not mutually exclusive. This is right before Chimera takes his shot, (which was weak), from the nearest vantage point to the ref's out of the videos shared in this thread:Appreciated.
Either it meets criteria or it doesnt. Binary in a sense. This one fails 3 of 4. There is no justification. Its a mistake. Human error.
Not mutually exclusive. This is right before Chimera takes his shot, (which was weak), from the nearest vantage point to the ref's out of the videos shared in this thread:
If there was no contact, and Chimera simply shot poorly by himself, well, like you said, human error.